Compare StocksINTU vs IRM

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, INTU is undervalued at $321, with a DCF intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 40%. IRM is overvalued at $125, with an intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$321.44
VS
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
$125.34

Rewards

INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
IRM

    Risks

    INTU
    • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    IRM
    • PEG ratio of 2.70 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.9x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.83 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    IRM
    Valuation
    $5.23B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-499.46M
    5.95%
    FCF Yield
    -1.34%
    19.60
    Trailing P/E
    136.24
    11.76
    Forward P/E
    46.85
    Quality & Moat
    28.21%
    ROIC
    6.08%
    22.50%
    ROE
    N/A
    80.79%
    Gross Margin
    55.02%
    0.82
    PEG Ratio
    2.70
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.01
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.02
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    7.95
    1.52%
    Dividend Yield
    2.83%
    INTU: 8Ties: 1IRM: 1
    INTUIRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    IRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $12.31
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$75.17B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    IRM
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-1.94B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$10.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    40.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 40.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $321.44
    Fair Value: $536.01
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    IRM
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $125.34
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $321?

    +7.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +5.3%

    The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    IRM

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    79/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    IRM
    51/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    IRM
    -2.66
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 6.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,638
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    IRM
    Insiders 0.9%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 11.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,493
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    IRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2,954
    KELLY CHRISTIE BARTON
    Director
    $2,954
    @ $89.52 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.62M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $228,121
    @ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    IRM
    9
    Sells (3M)
    30
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $114.61M
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.73M
    @ $122.83 · 2026-07-01
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $753,720
    @ $125.62 · 2026-07-01
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.91M
    @ $127.55 · 2026-06-01
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $760,200
    @ $126.70 · 2026-06-01
    BORGES DANIEL
    Officer
    $902,220
    @ $125.50 · 2026-05-21
    RAKOWICH WALTER C.
    Director
    $94,209
    @ $124.45 · 2026-05-20
    ARWAY PAMELA M.
    Director
    $244,011
    @ $128.97 · 2026-05-12
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $767,460
    @ $127.91 · 2026-05-08
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.96M
    @ $128.93 · 2026-05-08
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.95M
    @ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $616,260
    @ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
    BHARGAVA MITHU
    Officer
    $6.25M
    @ $104.62 · 2026-03-19
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.48M
    @ $106.25 · 2026-03-05
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $21.13M
    @ $107.10 · 2026-03-04
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $15.00M
    @ $109.39 · 2026-03-02
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $643,620
    @ $107.27 · 2026-03-02
    ALLERTON JENNIFER
    Director
    $762,160
    @ $108.88 · 2026-03-02
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.16M
    @ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $649,020
    @ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.20M
    @ $83.17 · 2026-01-02
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $498,600
    @ $83.10 · 2026-01-02
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.76M
    @ $83.34 · 2025-12-01
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $510,000
    @ $85.00 · 2025-12-01
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $615,060
    @ $102.51 · 2025-11-03
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.10M
    @ $102.75 · 2025-11-03
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $736,591
    @ $100.82 · 2025-10-31
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $609,780
    @ $101.63 · 2025-10-01
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.07M
    @ $102.34 · 2025-10-01
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.19M
    @ $89.56 · 2025-09-03
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $546,300
    @ $91.05 · 2025-09-02
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $583,200
    @ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
    MCINTOSH GREG W
    Officer
    $1.69M
    @ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.54M
    @ $94.55 · 2025-08-01
    KIDD MARK
    Officer
    $612,120
    @ $102.02 · 2025-07-01
    MCINTOSH GREG W
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $100.00 · 2025-07-01
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.94M
    @ $100.36 · 2025-07-01
    RAKOWICH WALTER C.
    Director
    $89,973
    @ $99.97 · 2025-06-04
    MCINTOSH GREG W
    Officer
    $1.70M
    @ $98.19 · 2025-06-02
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.83M
    @ $98.77 · 2025-06-02
    MCINTOSH GREG W
    Officer
    $807,384
    @ $96.14 · 2025-05-22
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.64M
    @ $96.09 · 2025-05-02
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.95M
    @ $86.11 · 2025-04-01
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $21.25M
    @ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $21.25M
    @ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
    BHARGAVA MITHU
    Officer
    $161,356
    @ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
    BORGES DANIEL
    Officer
    $597,240
    @ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $15.76M
    @ $91.33 · 2025-03-03
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.90M
    @ $99.83 · 2025-02-03
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.25M
    @ $104.85 · 2025-01-02
    BHARGAVA MITHU
    Officer
    $863,401
    @ $104.49 · 2024-12-23
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.60M
    @ $113.55 · 2024-12-11
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.76M
    @ $118.47 · 2024-11-11
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.73M
    @ $117.52 · 2024-10-08
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.70M
    @ $116.43 · 2024-09-18
    MURDOCK WENDY J
    Director
    $989,230
    @ $116.38 · 2024-09-17
    MARSON DEBORAH
    General Counsel
    $406,296
    @ $112.86 · 2024-09-03
    MEANEY WILLIAM L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.46M
    @ $109.08 · 2024-08-20
    BAKER-GREENE EDWARD
    Officer
    $248,254
    @ $109.75 · 2024-08-20
    TOMOVCSIK JOHN
    Chief Operating Officer
    $110,000
    @ $110.00 · 2024-08-19
    MARSON DEBORAH
    General Counsel
    $498,741
    @ $107.58 · 2024-08-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    IRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    IRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView IRM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs IRM

    Is Intuit Inc. or Iron Mountain Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 40.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $321), compared to IRM's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $125).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Iron Mountain Incorporated?

    INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while IRM scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Iron Mountain Incorporated in financial distress?

    IRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Iron Mountain Incorporated?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 6.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated's -1.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Iron Mountain Incorporated?

    INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus IRM's 6.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Iron Mountain Incorporated's?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to IRM's 39/100 (Unsafe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.