Compare StocksAMT vs INTU

American Tower Corporation (AMT) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, AMT is overvalued at $176, with a DCF intrinsic value of $2 and a margin of safety of -7831%. INTU is undervalued at $318, with an intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

AMT
American Tower Corporation
$176.39
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$318.13

Rewards

AMT
  • Gross margin of 73.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AMT
  • High leverage (4.22x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.16 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
INTU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMT
    INTU
    Valuation
    $2.92B
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.62B
    3.55%
    FCF Yield
    10.14%
    24.26
    Trailing P/E
    19.34
    25.16
    Forward P/E
    11.63
    Quality & Moat
    7.11%
    ROIC
    10.90%
    33.91%
    ROE
    23.60%
    73.77%
    Gross Margin
    80.98%
    1.67
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    4.22
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.06
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.14
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.18
    3.96%
    Dividend Yield
    1.74%
    AMT: 2Ties: 1INTU: 9
    AMTINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMT
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-2.91B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-16.77B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $-11.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-89.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMT
    7830.7% Overvalued
    Price is 7830.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $176.39
    Fair Value: $2.22
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    43.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $318.13
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $176?

    +18.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.1%

    The market implies +18.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $318?

    +5.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.9%

    The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMT
    51/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMT
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMT
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 96.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,398
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMT
    1
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.99M
    KALATHUR RAJESH
    Director
    $500,733
    @ $177.00 · 2026-08-21
    KALATHUR RAJESH
    Director
    $494,936
    @ $185.30 · 2026-03-10
    REILLY EUGENE F
    Director
    $994,110
    @ $178.99 · 2025-10-31
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMT
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $23.24M
    DOWLING RUTH T
    General Counsel
    $309,641
    @ $172.89 · 2026-07-29
    MEYER ROBERT JOSEPH JR
    Officer
    $894,450
    @ $178.89 · 2026-07-29
    DOWLING RUTH T
    Officer
    $173,092
    @ $178.08 · 2026-04-29
    VONDRAN STEVEN OWEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.31M
    @ $188.46 · 2026-03-04
    DOWLING RUTH T
    General Counsel
    $128,564
    @ $188.51 · 2026-03-04
    NOEL EUGENE M
    Chief Operating Officer
    $7.87M
    @ $191.05 · 2026-03-02
    DOWLING RUTH T
    General Counsel
    $122,121
    @ $186.16 · 2026-02-27
    MEYER ROBERT JOSEPH JR
    Officer
    $831,695
    @ $186.73 · 2026-02-27
    SMITH RODNEY M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.60M
    @ $192.09 · 2026-02-17
    FONT JUAN HERNANDEZ
    Officer
    $149,998
    @ $208.33 · 2025-07-31
    GOEL SANJAY
    Officer
    $863,680
    @ $215.92 · 2025-03-17
    MEYER ROBERT JOSEPH JR
    Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $201.67 · 2025-02-27
    REEVE PAMELA D A
    Director
    $1.01M
    @ $202.97 · 2025-02-26
    SMITH RODNEY M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.14M
    @ $189.70 · 2025-02-13
    SMITH RODNEY M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $181.10 · 2025-01-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(31/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
    View AMT Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AMT vs INTU

    Is American Tower Corporation or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 43.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $318), compared to AMT's -7830.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $2 vs. $176).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Tower Corporation or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while AMT scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is American Tower Corporation in financial distress?

    AMT's Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, American Tower Corporation or Intuit Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to American Tower Corporation's 3.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Tower Corporation or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus AMT's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, American Tower Corporation's or Intuit Inc.'s?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to AMT's 24/100 (Unsafe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    AMT vs INTU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io