Compare StocksINTC vs YUM

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
$156.25

Rewards

INTC
    YUM
    • Yum! Brands, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Yum! Brands, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    YUM
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $2.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    YUM
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.31B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    3.02%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    28.15
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    20.92
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    15.71%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    46.16%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.02
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.29
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.92%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1YUM: 5
    INTCYUM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    YUM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    YUM
    $2.49
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.42B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    YUM
    41.8% Overvalued
    Price is 41.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $156.25
    Fair Value: $110.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    YUM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $156?

    +15.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.0%

    The market implies +15.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    YUM
    88/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    YUM
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    YUM
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.3%Retail & Other 10.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,845
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    YUM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    YUM
    6
    Sells (3M)
    26
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $15.51M
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $47,725
    @ $166.29 · 2026-03-02
    TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39,577
    @ $166.29 · 2026-03-02
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $47,150
    @ $166.02 · 2026-02-26
    TURNER CHRISTOPHER LEE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40,177
    @ $166.02 · 2026-02-26
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $265,384
    @ $164.63 · 2026-02-13
    POWELL AARON
    Officer
    $1.94M
    @ $161.44 · 2026-02-05
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $42,275
    @ $153.17 · 2025-12-01
    SKEANS TRACY L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.63M
    @ $149.10 · 2025-11-17
    POWELL AARON
    Officer
    $419,839
    @ $150.48 · 2025-11-11
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $261,162
    @ $148.81 · 2025-11-06
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $42,116
    @ $154.27 · 2025-11-05
    BURKHARDT ERIKA
    Officer
    $189,551
    @ $149.37 · 2025-11-05
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $41,962
    @ $152.59 · 2025-10-01
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $149.80 · 2025-09-15
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $39,223
    @ $145.27 · 2025-09-02
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $146.84 · 2025-08-15
    SKEANS TRACY L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $148.24 · 2025-08-15
    GRADDICK-WEIR MIRIAN M
    Director
    $296,121
    @ $145.30 · 2025-08-14
    CORNELL BRIAN C
    Director
    $291,034
    @ $139.92 · 2025-08-06
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $36,799
    @ $139.92 · 2025-08-06
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $146.60 · 2025-07-15
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $40,332
    @ $148.28 · 2025-07-01
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $144.00 · 2025-06-16
    MEZVINSKY SCOTT
    Officer
    $39,120
    @ $145.97 · 2025-06-04
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $145.57 · 2025-05-15
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $753,891
    @ $146.70 · 2025-04-15
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $816,392
    @ $154.24 · 2025-03-17
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $384,480
    @ $160.00 · 2025-03-06
    BURKHARDT ERIKA
    Officer
    $94,965
    @ $159.07 · 2025-03-06
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.88M
    @ $159.46 · 2025-03-05
    RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
    Officer
    $793,300
    @ $158.66 · 2025-03-05
    RUSSELL DAVID ERIC
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $144.63 · 2025-02-10
    SKALA JUSTIN PETER
    Director
    $221,261
    @ $145.28 · 2025-02-10
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $522,884
    @ $137.06 · 2024-12-16
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $446,130
    @ $137.06 · 2024-12-16
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $959,600
    @ $135.94 · 2024-11-15
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $941,682
    @ $134.43 · 2024-10-15
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $941,682
    @ $134.43 · 2024-09-16
    GRADDICK-WEIR MIRIAN M
    Director
    $179,857
    @ $137.40 · 2024-08-19
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $974,956
    @ $137.92 · 2024-08-15
    CATLETT SCOTT A
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $137.79 · 2024-08-13
    SAMI SABIR
    Officer
    $9.75M
    @ $137.16 · 2024-08-07
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $912,030
    @ $131.02 · 2024-07-15
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $963,332
    @ $136.43 · 2024-06-17
    CATLETT SCOTT A
    Officer
    $848,151
    @ $141.50 · 2024-05-17
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $969,991
    @ $137.14 · 2024-05-15
    ALVES PAGET LEONARD
    Director
    $859,223
    @ $136.19 · 2024-05-02
    GIBBS DAVID W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $979,383
    @ $138.37 · 2024-04-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    YUM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    YUM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView YUM Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io