Compare Stocks › INTC vs VRSK
Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$201.69
Rewards
INTC
VRSK
- ★Verisk Analytics, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Gross margin of 69.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Verisk Analytics, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
Risks
INTC
- ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
VRSK
- ⚠High leverage (15.82x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →INTC
VRSK
Valuation
$-4.50B
Free Cash Flow
$1.01B
-1.95%
FCF Yield
3.60%
N/A
Trailing P/E
31.12
46.59
Forward P/E
23.46
Quality & Moat
1.24%
ROIC
20.49%
-0.21%
ROE
293.19%
36.56%
Gross Margin
69.88%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.37
Debt / Equity
15.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.77
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.83
N/A
Dividend Yield
0.99%
INTC: 2Ties: 1VRSK: 6
INTCVRSK
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →INTC
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
VRSK
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VRSK
$2.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.81B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $46.18
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VRSK
19.7% Overvalued
Price is 19.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $201.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $168.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →INTC
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
VRSK
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $202?
+14.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%
The market implies +14.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
VRSK
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →INTC
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VRSK
-3.05
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →INTC
Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,156
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VRSK
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.8%Retail & Other 1.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,471
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →INTC
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$124,173
@ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$125,674
@ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VRSK
3
Buys (3M)
7
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.02M
STEVENSON KIMBERLY S.
Director
$179,200
@ $179.20 · 2026-02-20
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
Director
$180,000
@ $180.00 · 2026-02-20
HENDRICK GREGORY S.
Director
$90,080
@ $180.16 · 2026-02-20
PURTILL SABRA R
Director
$98,078
@ $217.95 · 2025-10-31
DAILEY JEFFREY J
Director
$108,515
@ $217.03 · 2025-10-31
HENDRICK GREGORY S.
Director
$108,070
@ $216.14 · 2025-10-31
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
Director
$259,800
@ $259.80 · 2025-08-13
LANE WENDY E.
Director
$158,184
@ $263.64 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →INTC
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $981,000
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VRSK
0
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $14.57M
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$65,862
@ $219.54 · 2025-12-16
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$480,766
@ $218.53 · 2025-11-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$65,097
@ $216.99 · 2025-11-17
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$72,669
@ $242.23 · 2025-10-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$76,416
@ $254.72 · 2025-09-16
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.44M
@ $265.00 · 2025-09-03
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$589,611
@ $268.00 · 2025-08-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$80,400
@ $268.00 · 2025-08-15
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.47M
@ $272.03 · 2025-08-04
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$91,164
@ $303.88 · 2025-07-15
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.63M
@ $300.86 · 2025-07-03
BECKLES KATHY CARD
Officer
$98,080
@ $300.86 · 2025-07-03
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$92,670
@ $308.90 · 2025-06-17
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$3.65M
@ $313.06 · 2025-06-13
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.72M
@ $318.10 · 2025-06-04
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$671,055
@ $305.02 · 2025-05-16
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$90,651
@ $302.17 · 2025-05-15
GROVER DAVID J.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $307.68 · 2025-05-09
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$88,614
@ $295.38 · 2025-04-15
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$337,029
@ $285.86 · 2025-04-07
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$634,689
@ $288.50 · 2025-03-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$86,349
@ $287.83 · 2025-03-17
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$348,229
@ $295.36 · 2025-03-07
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$347,746
@ $294.95 · 2025-02-07
BECKLES KATHY CARD
Officer
$595,429
@ $282.06 · 2025-01-17
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$321,643
@ $272.81 · 2025-01-07
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$56,750
@ $283.75 · 2024-12-16
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$567,200
@ $283.60 · 2024-11-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$57,298
@ $286.49 · 2024-11-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$54,266
@ $271.33 · 2024-10-15
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$889,450
@ $265.27 · 2024-10-04
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$54,174
@ $270.87 · 2024-09-16
GROVER DAVID J.
Officer
$1.74M
@ $271.56 · 2024-08-29
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$534,770
@ $267.38 · 2024-08-16
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$53,718
@ $268.59 · 2024-08-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$55,476
@ $277.38 · 2024-07-15
BECKLES KATHY CARD
Officer
$88,744
@ $272.22 · 2024-07-03
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$52,462
@ $262.31 · 2024-06-17
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$496,480
@ $248.24 · 2024-05-16
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$49,658
@ $248.29 · 2024-05-15
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$376,058
@ $248.88 · 2024-05-13
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$3.31M
@ $235.20 · 2024-05-03
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$46,000
@ $230.00 · 2024-05-01
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$346,433
@ $222.93 · 2024-04-12
GROVER DAVID J.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $233.06 · 2024-03-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →INTC
😐Neutral(53/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VRSK
😨Fear(35/100)
"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
VRSK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)