Compare StocksINTC vs VLTO

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Veralto Corporation (VLTO)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
VLTO
Veralto Corporation
$87.63

Rewards

INTC
    VLTO
    • Veralto Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Veralto Corporation scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    VLTO
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.44 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    VLTO
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.01B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    4.71%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    22.59
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    18.87
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    17.87%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    31.27%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    59.86%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.70
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.96
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.05
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.59%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1VLTO: 6
    INTCVLTO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    VLTO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    VLTO
    $2.87
    created per $1 retained over 2 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.57B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$4.52B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    VLTO
    4.5% Overvalued
    Price is 4.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $87.63
    Fair Value: $83.85
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    VLTO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $88?

    +10.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.4%

    The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    VLTO
    92/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    VLTO
    -2.47
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    VLTO
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.5%Retail & Other 0.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,524
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    VLTO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    VLTO
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.05M
    AQUINO MELISSA
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $96.60 · 2026-02-27
    BYSTROM MATTIAS
    Officer
    $101,730
    @ $101.73 · 2025-12-01
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $106.26 · 2025-08-29
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $85,266
    @ $100.55 · 2025-06-02
    BENETEAU LESLEY
    Officer
    $46,185
    @ $100.84 · 2025-05-15
    BYSTROM MATTIAS
    Officer
    $249,906
    @ $99.96 · 2025-05-12
    SKEETE BERNARD M
    Officer
    $42,480
    @ $94.40 · 2025-05-01
    AQUINO MELISSA
    Officer
    $2.97M
    @ $93.67 · 2025-05-01
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $56,959
    @ $96.54 · 2025-05-01
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $989,710
    @ $95.00 · 2025-04-30
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $57,260
    @ $97.05 · 2025-04-01
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $98.56 · 2025-03-24
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $100.35 · 2025-02-25
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $59,206
    @ $100.35 · 2025-02-25
    AQUINO MELISSA
    Officer
    $46,115
    @ $99.60 · 2025-02-11
    SKEETE BERNARD M
    Officer
    $21,756
    @ $108.78 · 2024-11-26
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $77,388
    @ $102.91 · 2024-11-01
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $84,750
    @ $112.55 · 2024-10-01
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.45M
    @ $110.15 · 2024-09-30
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $83,658
    @ $111.10 · 2024-09-03
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.48M
    @ $111.98 · 2024-08-30
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $813,890
    @ $110.00 · 2024-08-21
    TRIVEDI SUREKHA
    Officer
    $80,360
    @ $106.72 · 2024-08-01
    HONEYCUTT JENNIFER L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $105.17 · 2024-07-30
    BYSTROM MATTIAS
    Officer
    $317,670
    @ $105.89 · 2024-07-29
    BYSTROM MATTIAS
    Officer
    $30,315
    @ $100.38 · 2024-05-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    VLTO
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(42/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    VLTO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView VLTO Full Analysis
    INTC vs VLTO: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io