Compare StocksINTC vs USB

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs U.S. Bancorp (USB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, INTC is overvalued at $90, with a DCF intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. USB is undervalued at $63, with an intrinsic value of $103 and a margin of safety of 39%. Of the two, USB has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20
VS
USB
U.S. Bancorp
$63.01

Rewards

INTC
    USB
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.15 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    USB
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • PEG ratio of 2.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    USB
    Valuation
    $4.87B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    1.07%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    12.58
    44.27
    Forward P/E
    10.90
    Quality & Moat
    3.57%
    ROIC
    8.91%
    -10.71%
    ROE
    12.62%
    38.87%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.11
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.24
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    3.30%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1USB: 4
    INTCUSB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    USB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    USB
    $1.80
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $9.04B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$16.23B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    USB
    38.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 38.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $63.01
    Fair Value: $103.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    USB

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    USB
    60/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    USB
    -2.43
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    USB
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 85.3%Retail & Other 14.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,552
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    USB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GILLANI ALEEM
    Director
    $186,600
    @ $37.32 · 2025-04-21
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    USB
    2
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $18.71M
    CHOSY JAMES L
    General Counsel
    $1.45M
    @ $63.28 · 2026-07-23
    PHILIPSON STEPHEN L.
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $63.08 · 2026-07-20
    DILIP VENKATACHARI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $55.52 · 2026-05-05
    RICHARD JODI L
    Officer
    $2.28M
    @ $57.00 · 2026-04-21
    RUNKEL MARK G
    Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $60.65 · 2026-02-06
    BARCELOS ELCIO R.T.
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $58.43 · 2026-02-03
    CECERE ANDREW J
    Director
    $6.51M
    @ $46.35 · 2025-10-20
    CHOSY JAMES L
    General Counsel
    $1.26M
    @ $46.86 · 2025-10-20
    STARK LISA R
    Officer
    $923,400
    @ $46.40 · 2025-07-21
    BADRAN SOUHEIL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $46.34 · 2025-07-21
    ROY ARIJIT
    Officer
    $97,701
    @ $43.68 · 2025-03-07
    RICHARD JODI L
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $47.59 · 2025-02-06
    CHOSY JAMES L
    General Counsel
    $1.02M
    @ $47.65 · 2025-02-05
    CECERE ANDREW J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.82M
    @ $47.25 · 2025-02-04
    STARK LISA R
    Officer
    $151,144
    @ $47.10 · 2025-02-03
    DOLAN TERRANCE ROBERT
    Officer
    $3.11M
    @ $46.96 · 2025-02-03
    RICHARD JODI L
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $49.03 · 2024-10-18
    KOTWAL SHAILESH M
    Officer
    $1.74M
    @ $49.74 · 2024-10-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    USB
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    USB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView USB Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs USB

    Is Intel Corporation or U.S. Bancorp more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, USB trades at a 38.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $103 vs. price $63), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or U.S. Bancorp?

    USB scores 60/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is U.S. Bancorp in financial distress?

    USB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or U.S. Bancorp?

    USB earns 8.9% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.