Compare StocksINTC vs TTD

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. TTD is undervalued at $19, with an intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of 47%. Of the two, TTD has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
$18.51

Rewards

INTC
    TTD
    • Gross margin of 77.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.27 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    TTD

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTC
      TTD
      Valuation
      $-8.30B
      Free Cash Flow
      $782.96M
      -1.23%
      FCF Yield
      9.00%
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      21.03
      86.70
      Forward P/E
      8.61
      Quality & Moat
      1.72%
      ROIC
      7.89%
      -2.91%
      ROE
      16.74%
      37.20%
      Gross Margin
      77.83%
      1.36
      PEG Ratio
      0.90
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.10
      Net Debt / Equity
      Net cash
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.86
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      -1.38
      0.00%
      Dividend Yield
      0.00%
      INTC: 0Ties: 1TTD: 10
      INTCTTD

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      TTD

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      TTD
      $-3.86
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $1.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-3.92B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $133.99
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      TTD
      47.3% Margin of Safety
      Price is 47.3% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $18.51
      Fair Value: $35.13
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      TTD

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $19?

      +5.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -2.0%

      The market implies +5.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      TTD
      59/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTC
      -2.83
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      TTD
      -3.05
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,349
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      TTD
      Insiders 2.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 8.1%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,153
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $249,985
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,946
      @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      TTD
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $148.10M
      GREEN JEFFREY TERRY
      Chief Executive Officer
      $148.10M
      @ $24.68 · 2026-03-04
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      2
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $7.47M
      CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
      Chief Technology Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $4.01M
      @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      TTD
      1
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $5.88M
      JACOBSON SAMANTHA
      Director
      $1.13M
      @ $21.14 · 2026-05-28
      CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE
      Director
      $67,625
      @ $48.20 · 2025-09-10
      GRANT JAY R
      Officer
      $4.68M
      @ $91.18 · 2025-08-07
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $368,662
      @ $76.66 · 2025-05-16
      WELLS DAVID B
      Director
      $2.29M
      @ $79.88 · 2025-05-13
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $446,180
      @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
      JACOBSON SAMANTHA
      Officer and Director
      $509,551
      @ $118.56 · 2025-01-28
      GRANT JAY R
      Officer
      $2.21M
      @ $119.35 · 2024-12-30
      JACOBSON SAMANTHA
      Officer and Director
      $513,316
      @ $119.46 · 2024-12-30
      JACOBSON SAMANTHA
      Officer and Director
      $2.83M
      @ $128.25 · 2024-11-29
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $369,364
      @ $117.97 · 2024-11-18
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.53M
      @ $127.55 · 2024-11-07
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.01M
      @ $120.43 · 2024-10-22
      RAJARAM GOKUL
      Director
      $159,741
      @ $117.89 · 2024-10-21
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.89M
      @ $115.43 · 2024-10-09
      GRANT JAY R
      Officer
      $2.24M
      @ $108.65 · 2024-09-30
      RAJARAM GOKUL
      Director
      $147,695
      @ $109.00 · 2024-09-24
      RAJARAM GOKUL
      Director
      $141,855
      @ $104.69 · 2024-08-22
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $310,903
      @ $99.33 · 2024-08-16
      JACOBSON SAMANTHA
      Officer and Director
      $484,764
      @ $99.50 · 2024-08-16
      CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE
      Director
      $160,712
      @ $100.07 · 2024-08-15
      FALBERG KATHRYN E.
      Director
      $14.73M
      @ $98.17 · 2024-08-13
      JACOBSON SAMANTHA
      Officer and Director
      $2.11M
      @ $99.50 · 2024-08-12
      RAJARAM GOKUL
      Director
      $133,291
      @ $98.37 · 2024-07-22
      SCHENKEIN LAURA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.51M
      @ $100.43 · 2024-07-09
      GRANT JAY R
      Officer
      $13.78M
      @ $97.42 · 2024-06-28
      RAJARAM GOKUL
      Director
      $236,477
      @ $97.92 · 2024-06-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(65/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      TTD
      FearGreed
      🥶Extreme Fear(20/100)

      "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
      TTD
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (20)
      View INTC Full AnalysisView TTD Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs TTD

      Is Intel Corporation or The Trade Desk, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTD trades at a 47.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $35 vs. price $19), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

      TTD scores 59/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

      INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTD scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

      The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) generates a 9.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

      TTD earns 7.9% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.