Compare StocksINTC vs TRGP

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
$239.53

Rewards

INTC
    TRGP
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.45 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • PEG ratio of 0.38 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    TRGP
    • High leverage (5.49x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • 7 insider sales totaling $25.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.7% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    TRGP
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-264.40M
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    -0.51%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    28.25
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    21.60
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    14.67%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    57.92%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    38.29%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.38
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    5.49
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.59
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.67%
    INTC: 2Ties: 2TRGP: 5
    INTCTRGP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    TRGP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TRGP
    $8.45
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.72B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$22.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TRGP
    94.3% Overvalued
    Price is 94.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $239.53
    Fair Value: $123.29
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TRGP

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TRGP
    54/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TRGP
    -3.07
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TRGP
    Insiders 1.4%Institutions 95.6%Retail & Other 3.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,317
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TRGP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TRGP
    7
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $25.97M
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $241.34 · 2026-03-05
    BRANSTETTER BENJAMIN J
    Officer
    $778,124
    @ $238.83 · 2026-03-02
    MCDONIE PATRICK J
    Officer
    $7.55M
    @ $239.36 · 2026-03-02
    COOKSEN LINDSEY M
    Director
    $100,797
    @ $231.72 · 2026-02-26
    PRYOR DOUGLAS SCOTT
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $228.92 · 2026-02-25
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $311,619
    @ $229.30 · 2026-02-24
    KNEALE JENNIFER R
    President
    $6.79M
    @ $230.12 · 2026-02-24
    SHRADER GERALD R
    General Counsel
    $498,328
    @ $181.21 · 2025-12-05
    CHUNG PAUL W
    Director
    $1.26M
    @ $202.91 · 2025-02-28
    COOKSEN LINDSEY M
    Director
    $208,042
    @ $198.14 · 2025-02-28
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $378,167
    @ $194.23 · 2025-02-25
    KNEALE JENNIFER R
    Officer
    $5.75M
    @ $192.42 · 2025-02-25
    MELOY MATTHEW J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.53M
    @ $195.08 · 2025-02-25
    DAVIS WATERS S IV
    Director
    $429,802
    @ $196.26 · 2025-02-25
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $505,736
    @ $202.29 · 2024-12-02
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $190.52 · 2024-11-15
    CHUNG PAUL W
    Director
    $3.43M
    @ $190.03 · 2024-11-08
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $1.14M
    @ $190.68 · 2024-11-08
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $621,809
    @ $190.74 · 2024-11-08
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $365,504
    @ $146.20 · 2024-09-03
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $140.04 · 2024-08-14
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $688,134
    @ $137.63 · 2024-08-12
    SHRADER GERALD R
    General Counsel
    $408,195
    @ $136.06 · 2024-08-09
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $134.74 · 2024-08-08
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $160,146
    @ $132.02 · 2024-08-06
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $1.29M
    @ $130.31 · 2024-06-28
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $13,000
    @ $130.00 · 2024-06-26
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $120.08 · 2024-06-10
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $1.46M
    @ $116.63 · 2024-06-03
    REDD ERSHEL C JR
    Director
    $339,297
    @ $113.10 · 2024-05-10
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $787,761
    @ $112.54 · 2024-05-08
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $549,779
    @ $112.78 · 2024-05-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TRGP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    TRGP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView TRGP Full Analysis