Compare StocksINTC vs TRGP

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. TRGP is overvalued at $259, with an intrinsic value of $50 and a margin of safety of -422%. Of the two, TRGP has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
$258.58

Rewards

INTC
    TRGP
    • Targa Resources Corp. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.97 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    TRGP
    • High leverage (5.82x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Insiders have sold $2.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.7% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    TRGP
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-318.55M
    -1.23%
    FCF Yield
    -0.57%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    26.41
    86.70
    Forward P/E
    21.01
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    12.21%
    -2.91%
    ROE
    74.10%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    41.77%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.25
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.10
    Net Debt / Equity
    5.82
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.65
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.64%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1TRGP: 8
    INTCTRGP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TRGP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TRGP
    $8.45
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.72B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$22.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TRGP
    132.2% Overvalued
    Price is 132.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $258.58
    Fair Value: $111.36
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TRGP

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TRGP
    54/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TRGP
    -3.07
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TRGP
    Insiders 1.4%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 1.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,409
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TRGP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TRGP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $28.68M
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $2.71M
    @ $255.96 · 2026-05-12
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $241.34 · 2026-03-05
    BRANSTETTER BENJAMIN J
    Officer
    $778,124
    @ $238.83 · 2026-03-02
    MCDONIE PATRICK J
    Officer
    $7.55M
    @ $239.36 · 2026-03-02
    COOKSEN LINDSEY M
    Director
    $100,797
    @ $231.72 · 2026-02-26
    PRYOR DOUGLAS SCOTT
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $228.92 · 2026-02-25
    KNEALE JENNIFER R
    President
    $6.79M
    @ $230.12 · 2026-02-24
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $311,619
    @ $229.30 · 2026-02-24
    SHRADER GERALD R
    General Counsel
    $498,328
    @ $181.21 · 2025-12-05
    COOKSEN LINDSEY M
    Director
    $208,042
    @ $198.14 · 2025-02-28
    CHUNG PAUL W
    Director
    $1.26M
    @ $202.91 · 2025-02-28
    KNEALE JENNIFER R
    Officer
    $5.75M
    @ $192.42 · 2025-02-25
    MELOY MATTHEW J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.53M
    @ $195.08 · 2025-02-25
    DAVIS WATERS S IV
    Director
    $429,802
    @ $196.26 · 2025-02-25
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $378,167
    @ $194.23 · 2025-02-25
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $505,736
    @ $202.29 · 2024-12-02
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $190.52 · 2024-11-15
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $621,809
    @ $190.74 · 2024-11-08
    CHUNG PAUL W
    Director
    $3.43M
    @ $190.03 · 2024-11-08
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $1.14M
    @ $190.68 · 2024-11-08
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $365,504
    @ $146.20 · 2024-09-03
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $140.04 · 2024-08-14
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $688,134
    @ $137.63 · 2024-08-12
    SHRADER GERALD R
    General Counsel
    $408,195
    @ $136.06 · 2024-08-09
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $134.74 · 2024-08-08
    BOUSHKA JULIE H.
    Officer
    $160,146
    @ $132.02 · 2024-08-06
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $1.29M
    @ $130.31 · 2024-06-28
    MURARO ROBERT M
    Officer
    $13,000
    @ $130.00 · 2024-06-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TRGP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    TRGP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView TRGP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs TRGP

    Is Intel Corporation or Targa Resources Corp. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TRGP trades at a -421.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $50 vs. price $259), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Targa Resources Corp.?

    TRGP scores 54/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TRGP scores 2.3 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Targa Resources Corp.?

    Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) generates a -0.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Targa Resources Corp.?

    TRGP earns 12.2% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.