Compare StocksINTC vs TJX

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.
$156.83

Rewards

INTC
    TJX
    • The TJX Companies, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • The TJX Companies, Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    TJX
    • FCF yield of 2.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    TJX
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $3.89B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    2.23%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    32.14
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    27.66
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    26.72%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    53.92%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    30.96%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.15
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    1.32
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.22%
    INTC: 2Ties: 2TJX: 6
    INTCTJX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    TJX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TJX
    $6.62
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $9.86B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$65.23B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TJX
    29.6% Overvalued
    Price is 29.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $156.83
    Fair Value: $120.99
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TJX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $157?

    +14.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +19.2%

    The market implies +14.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +19.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TJX
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TJX
    -2.56
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TJX
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.1%Retail & Other 6.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,446
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TJX
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4,199
    ALVAREZ JOSE B
    Director
    $734.00
    @ $183.50 · 2026-03-05
    ALVAREZ JOSE B
    Director
    $3,465
    @ $133.27 · 2025-12-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TJX
    1
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $14.09M
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.83M
    @ $160.95 · 2026-03-02
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.15M
    @ $149.93 · 2025-11-21
    LANE AMY BETH
    Director
    $75,700
    @ $151.40 · 2025-11-21
    BENJAMIN PETER
    Officer
    $208,845
    @ $139.23 · 2025-09-08
    NEMEROV JACKWYN L
    Director
    $164,496
    @ $138.00 · 2025-09-02
    LANE AMY BETH
    Director
    $121,689
    @ $128.09 · 2025-06-03
    BENJAMIN PETER
    Officer
    $535,042
    @ $129.77 · 2025-05-22
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.10M
    @ $116.54 · 2025-03-20
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.88M
    @ $123.04 · 2025-03-05
    BENNETT ALAN M
    Director
    $988,254
    @ $123.53 · 2025-02-27
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $950,551
    @ $126.18 · 2024-12-05
    LANE AMY BETH
    Director
    $126,925
    @ $126.92 · 2024-11-27
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.32M
    @ $121.27 · 2024-11-22
    NEMEROV JACKWYN L
    Director
    $139,252
    @ $117.71 · 2024-09-12
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $117.54 · 2024-09-10
    GREENLEES LOUISE E.
    Officer
    $555,635
    @ $119.23 · 2024-08-22
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.41M
    @ $120.47 · 2024-08-22
    CHING DAVID T
    Director
    $1.55M
    @ $119.39 · 2024-08-22
    KLINGER JOHN
    Chief Financial Officer
    $713,116
    @ $105.10 · 2024-06-03
    CANESTRARI KENNETH D
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $104.01 · 2024-05-30
    GREENLEES LOUISE E.
    Officer
    $831,277
    @ $101.74 · 2024-05-29
    LANE AMY BETH
    Director
    $153,102
    @ $102.07 · 2024-05-28
    HERRMAN ERNIE L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.04M
    @ $102.17 · 2024-05-24
    CANESTRARI KENNETH D
    Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $100.00 · 2024-05-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TJX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    TJX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView TJX Full Analysis
    INTC vs TJX: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io