Compare StocksINTC vs TFC

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTC is overvalued at $109, with a DCF intrinsic value of $6 and a margin of safety of -1640%. TFC is undervalued at $48, with an intrinsic value of $75 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, TFC has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$109.24
VS
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$48.27

Risks

INTC
  • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TFC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Truist Financial Corporation scores only 10/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.18 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
TFC
Valuation
$4.87B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
0.84%
FCF Yield
N/A
N/A
Trailing P/E
11.10
52.98
Forward P/E
9.71
Quality & Moat
3.57%
ROIC
8.17%
-10.71%
ROE
9.06%
38.87%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.36
PEG Ratio
1.15
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.24
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
4.29%
INTC: 1Ties: 1TFC: 5
INTCTFC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TFC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TFC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-228.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$5.03B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $109.24
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TFC
35.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $48.27
Fair Value: $74.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $109?

+32.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

TFC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TFC
10/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TFC
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 14.0%Institutions 62.5%Retail & Other 23.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,436
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TFC
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 78.4%Retail & Other 21.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,143
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TFC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
ROGERS WILLIAM H JR
Chief Executive Officer
$1.66M
@ $48.56 · 2024-11-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TFC
2
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.97M
WILSON DONTA L
Officer
$688,618
@ $51.85 · 2026-07-31
BOYER K DAVID JR
Director
$202,090
@ $50.70 · 2026-07-23
POWELL CYNTHIA B
Officer
$183,715
@ $52.49 · 2026-02-02
MAGUIRE MICHAEL BARON
Chief Financial Officer
$651,664
@ $50.13 · 2026-01-26
BOYER K DAVID JR
Director
$239,682
@ $46.45 · 2025-11-25
BENDER BRADLEY D
Officer
$566,689
@ $45.19 · 2025-07-22
BOYER K DAVID JR
Director
$229,444
@ $46.20 · 2024-12-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TFC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
TFC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View INTC Full AnalysisView TFC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs TFC

Is Intel Corporation or Truist Financial Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TFC trades at a 35.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $75 vs. price $48), compared to INTC's -1639.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $6 vs. $109).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Truist Financial Corporation?

INTC scores 17/100 (None moat), while TFC scores 10/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Truist Financial Corporation in financial distress?

TFC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Truist Financial Corporation?

TFC earns 8.2% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs TFC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io