Compare StocksINTC vs TER

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$96.83
VS
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$339.46

Rewards

INTC
    TER
    • Teradyne, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • PEG ratio of 0.20 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
    • Altman Z-Score of 14.86 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    TER
    • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 63.0x is 69% above the historical average of 37.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • 6 insider sales with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    TER
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $450.41M
    -1.71%
    FCF Yield
    0.85%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    62.98
    64.92
    Forward P/E
    35.68
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    34.88%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    17.62%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    58.70%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    0.20
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.03
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.14
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.15%
    INTC: 0Ties: 1TER: 9
    INTCTER

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    TER

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TER
    $12.54
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.32B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$16.61B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $96.83
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TER
    31.4% Overvalued
    Price is 31.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $339.46
    Fair Value: $258.33
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TER

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $339?

    +29.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +32.2%

    The market implies +29.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +32.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TER
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TER
    -2.76
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TER
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.6%Retail & Other 2.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,536
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TER
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TER
    6
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.52M
    MILLS REGAN
    Officer
    $5,475
    @ $342.19 · 2026-04-08
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $195,125
    @ $312.20 · 2026-04-06
    MILLS REGAN
    Officer
    $73,302
    @ $290.88 · 2026-04-02
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $187,000
    @ $299.20 · 2026-03-05
    MILLS REGAN
    Officer
    $262,302
    @ $332.87 · 2026-02-25
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $166,862
    @ $266.98 · 2026-02-05
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $132,406
    @ $211.85 · 2026-01-05
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $223,051
    @ $201.31 · 2025-12-12
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $125,000
    @ $200.00 · 2025-12-05
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $199,662
    @ $180.20 · 2025-11-12
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $110,656
    @ $177.05 · 2025-11-05
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $160,926
    @ $145.24 · 2025-10-10
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $92,438
    @ $147.90 · 2025-10-06
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $70,020
    @ $126.39 · 2025-09-22
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $63,710
    @ $115.00 · 2025-09-12
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $75,038
    @ $120.06 · 2025-09-05
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $58,724
    @ $106.00 · 2025-08-12
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $66,250
    @ $106.00 · 2025-08-05
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $198,244
    @ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $58,574
    @ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $69,350
    @ $110.96 · 2025-03-03
    MEHTA SANJAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $154,302
    @ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
    DRISCOLL RYAN E
    General Counsel
    $24,082
    @ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
    BURNS RICHARD JOHN
    Officer
    $49,613
    @ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $70,362
    @ $112.58 · 2025-02-03
    MEHTA SANJAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $62,628
    @ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
    DRISCOLL RYAN E
    Officer
    $44,574
    @ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
    MEHTA SANJAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $656,040
    @ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
    DRISCOLL RYAN E
    General Counsel
    $9,340
    @ $122.89 · 2025-01-29
    BURNS RICHARD JOHN
    Officer
    $181,523
    @ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
    MEHTA SANJAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $215,592
    @ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
    DRISCOLL RYAN E
    General Counsel
    $12,895
    @ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
    BURNS RICHARD JOHN
    Officer
    $49,048
    @ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
    BURNS RICHARD JOHN
    Officer
    $49,048
    @ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $400,400
    @ $130.00 · 2025-01-03
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $79,225
    @ $126.76 · 2025-01-02
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $400,400
    @ $130.00 · 2024-12-16
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $68,775
    @ $110.04 · 2024-12-02
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $69,638
    @ $111.42 · 2024-11-07
    BURNS RICHARD JOHN
    Officer
    $129,548
    @ $132.19 · 2024-10-02
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $83,000
    @ $132.80 · 2024-10-01
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $409,024
    @ $132.80 · 2024-10-01
    SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $400,400
    @ $130.00 · 2024-09-11
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $83,431
    @ $133.49 · 2024-09-03
    MEHTA SANJAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $818,718
    @ $133.06 · 2024-08-20
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $80,481
    @ $128.77 · 2024-08-01
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $92,500
    @ $148.00 · 2024-07-01
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $89,900
    @ $143.84 · 2024-06-03
    BURNS RICHARD JOHN
    Officer
    $688,880
    @ $137.64 · 2024-05-20
    JOHNSON MERCEDES
    Director
    $75,750
    @ $121.20 · 2024-05-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TER
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    TER
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView TER Full Analysis
    INTC vs TER: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io