Compare Stocks › INTC vs TER

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTC is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. TER is overvalued at $274, with an intrinsic value of $229 and a margin of safety of -20%. Of the two, TER has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76
VS
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$274.37

Rewards

INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
TER
  • ★Teradyne, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Teradyne, Inc. scores 72/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.46 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TER
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠8 insider sales totaling $5.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
TER
Valuation
$670.37M
Free Cash Flow
$600.95M
0.19%
FCF Yield
1.40%
N/A
Trailing P/E
31.54
35.50
Forward P/E
22.88
Quality & Moat
4.06%
ROIC
31.48%
-9.62%
ROE
42.72%
40.15%
Gross Margin
59.32%
1.36
PEG Ratio
0.46
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.19%
INTC: 2Ties: 1TER: 8
INTCTER

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TER

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TER
$12.54
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.32B
Δ Market Cap
+$16.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TER
18.8% Overvalued
Price is 18.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $274.37
Fair Value: $231.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

TER

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $274?

+26.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.0%

The market implies +26.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TER
72/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TER
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TER
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 101.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,953
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TER
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TER
8
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.76M
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$140,000
@ $350.00 · 2026-10-21
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$273,024
@ $341.28 · 2026-10-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.37M
@ $341.28 · 2026-10-15
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$270,264
@ $337.83 · 2026-09-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.35M
@ $337.83 · 2026-09-15
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$56,997
@ $341.30 · 2026-09-01
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$510,000
@ $425.00 · 2026-08-17
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.70M
@ $425.00 · 2026-08-17
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$59,453
@ $358.15 · 2026-08-03
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$427,572
@ $356.31 · 2026-07-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $356.31 · 2026-07-15
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$76,820
@ $460.00 · 2026-07-01
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$507,636
@ $423.03 · 2026-06-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.69M
@ $423.03 · 2026-06-15
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$61,747
@ $369.74 · 2026-06-02
POULIN SHANNON JOHN
Officer
$581,013
@ $349.17 · 2026-05-22
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$140,000
@ $350.00 · 2026-05-21
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$271,184
@ $338.98 · 2026-05-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.91M
@ $338.98 · 2026-05-15
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$256,768
@ $377.60 · 2026-05-07
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$5,475
@ $342.19 · 2026-04-08
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$195,125
@ $312.20 · 2026-04-06
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$73,302
@ $290.88 · 2026-04-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$187,000
@ $299.20 · 2026-03-05
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$262,302
@ $332.87 · 2026-02-25
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$166,862
@ $266.98 · 2026-02-05
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$132,406
@ $211.85 · 2026-01-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$223,051
@ $201.31 · 2025-12-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$125,000
@ $200.00 · 2025-12-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$199,662
@ $180.20 · 2025-11-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$110,656
@ $177.05 · 2025-11-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$160,926
@ $145.24 · 2025-10-10
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$92,438
@ $147.90 · 2025-10-06
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$70,020
@ $126.39 · 2025-09-22
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$63,710
@ $115.00 · 2025-09-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$75,038
@ $120.06 · 2025-09-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$58,724
@ $106.00 · 2025-08-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$66,250
@ $106.00 · 2025-08-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$58,574
@ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$198,244
@ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$69,350
@ $110.96 · 2025-03-03
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$24,082
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$154,302
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,613
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$70,362
@ $112.58 · 2025-02-03
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$62,628
@ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
DRISCOLL RYAN E
Officer
$44,574
@ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$656,040
@ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$9,340
@ $122.89 · 2025-01-29
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$181,523
@ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$215,592
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$12,895
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,048
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,048
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2025-01-03
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$79,225
@ $126.76 · 2025-01-02
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2024-12-16
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$68,775
@ $110.04 · 2024-12-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$69,638
@ $111.42 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TER
FearGreed
😨Fear(24/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
TER
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (24)
View INTC Full AnalysisView TER Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs TER

Is Intel Corporation or Teradyne, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TER trades at a -20.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $229 vs. price $274), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Teradyne, Inc.?▼

TER scores 72/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TER scores 14.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Teradyne, Inc.?▼

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) generates a 1.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Teradyne, Inc.?▼

TER earns 31.5% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs TER: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io