Compare StocksINTC vs TDY

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Teledyne Technologies Incorpora (TDY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, INTC is overvalued at $90, with a DCF intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. TDY is undervalued at $656, with an intrinsic value of $22479957969 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, TDY has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20
VS
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorpora
$655.57

Rewards

INTC
    TDY
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 39.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    TDY
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.37 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Trailing P/E of 31.7x is 26% above the historical average of 25.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.40 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    TDY
    Valuation
    $4.87B
    Free Cash Flow
    $912.68M
    1.07%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    31.75
    44.27
    Forward P/E
    24.58
    Quality & Moat
    3.57%
    ROIC
    7.86%
    -10.71%
    ROE
    9.15%
    38.87%
    Gross Margin
    43.34%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.40
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.15
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.24
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.06
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    INTC: 1Ties: 2TDY: 7
    INTCTDY

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TDY

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TDY
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $2.60B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$110.82
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TDY
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $655.57
    Fair Value: $22479957969.30
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    TDY

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $656?

    -30.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -30.0%

    The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TDY
    64/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TDY
    -2.43
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TDY
    Insiders 0.9%Institutions 100.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,187
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TDY
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TDY
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.48M
    SMITH MICHAEL T.
    Director
    $2.48M
    @ $621.00 · 2026-01-29
    BOBB GEORGE C. III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.74M
    @ $555.41 · 2025-07-30
    SMITH MICHAEL T.
    Director
    $1.11M
    @ $560.10 · 2025-07-28
    LORNE SIMON M
    Director
    $3.47M
    @ $549.64 · 2025-07-25
    VANWEES JASON
    Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $520.06 · 2025-03-03
    CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
    General Counsel
    $367,090
    @ $519.96 · 2025-03-03
    MEHRABIAN ROBERT
    Officer and Director
    $16.15M
    @ $512.21 · 2025-02-07
    MEHRABIAN ROBERT
    Officer and Director
    $2.99M
    @ $518.22 · 2025-01-31
    CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
    General Counsel
    $1.38M
    @ $510.03 · 2025-01-29
    CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.78M
    @ $511.10 · 2025-01-28
    SMITH MICHAEL T.
    Director
    $1.07M
    @ $510.50 · 2025-01-27
    BELAK CYNTHIA Y.
    Officer
    $2.92M
    @ $508.34 · 2025-01-24
    BLACKWOOD STEPHEN FINIS
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.59M
    @ $513.62 · 2025-01-24
    BOBB GEORGE C. III
    President
    $3.20M
    @ $507.77 · 2025-01-24
    SMITH MICHAEL T.
    Director
    $968,456
    @ $478.25 · 2024-12-12
    CROCKER CHARLES
    Director
    $946,236
    @ $473.12 · 2024-12-09
    MEHRABIAN ROBERT
    Officer and Director
    $24.38M
    @ $487.58 · 2024-11-11
    VANWEES JASON
    Officer
    $2.45M
    @ $489.42 · 2024-11-08
    CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
    General Counsel
    $4.64M
    @ $490.17 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TDY
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    TDY
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView TDY Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs TDY

    Is Intel Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorpora more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TDY trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22479957969 vs. price $656), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorpora?

    TDY scores 64/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Teledyne Technologies Incorpora in financial distress?

    TDY's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorpora?

    TDY earns 7.9% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.