Compare Stocks › INTC vs TDG

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTC is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. TDG is overvalued at $1147, with an intrinsic value of $990 and a margin of safety of -16%. Of the two, TDG has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76
VS
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
$1146.81

Rewards

INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
TDG
  • ★TransDigm Group Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★TransDigm Group Incorporated scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 29.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TDG
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.05 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
TDG
Valuation
$670.37M
Free Cash Flow
$1.46B
0.19%
FCF Yield
2.30%
N/A
Trailing P/E
34.78
35.50
Forward P/E
23.58
Quality & Moat
4.06%
ROIC
10.86%
-9.62%
ROE
N/A
40.15%
Gross Margin
59.82%
1.36
PEG Ratio
3.05
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.03
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
INTC: 2Ties: 1TDG: 6
INTCTDG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TDG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TDG
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-6.62B
Δ Market Cap
+$40.74B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TDG
15.8% Overvalued
Price is 15.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1146.81
Fair Value: $990.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

TDG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1147?

+17.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +23.8%

The market implies +17.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +23.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TDG
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TDG
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TDG
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 97.5%Retail & Other 2.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,526
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TDG
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.84M
SMALL ROBERT J
Director
$1,285
@ $1285.00 · 2026-02-25
LISMAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.22M
@ $1284.26 · 2026-02-06
LISMAN MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$2.62M
@ $1339.14 · 2025-11-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TDG
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $61.69M
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.27M
@ $1094.58 · 2026-09-15
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.83M
@ $1238.76 · 2026-08-17
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.24M
@ $1216.21 · 2026-07-15
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$509,678
@ $1231.11 · 2026-07-15
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.98M
@ $1276.78 · 2026-06-15
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.50M
@ $1154.09 · 2026-05-15
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.99M
@ $1280.46 · 2026-04-15
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.85M
@ $1243.70 · 2026-03-16
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$5.05M
@ $1293.88 · 2026-02-17
MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
Chief Operating Officer
$414,729
@ $1430.10 · 2026-02-02
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$5.58M
@ $1429.92 · 2026-01-15
MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
Chief Operating Officer
$385,419
@ $1329.03 · 2026-01-02
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$5.03M
@ $1290.52 · 2025-12-15
SMALL ROBERT J
Director
$6.06M
@ $1290.19 · 2025-12-10
MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
Chief Operating Officer
$391,807
@ $1351.06 · 2025-12-01
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$5.23M
@ $1340.00 · 2025-11-17
MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
Chief Operating Officer
$379,900
@ $1310.00 · 2025-11-03
MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
Chief Operating Officer
$785,761
@ $1354.76 · 2025-10-27
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$3.84M
@ $1279.59 · 2025-10-20
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$3.83M
@ $1276.07 · 2025-09-22
GRAFF MICHAEL S
Director
$2.47M
@ $1402.09 · 2025-08-26
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.22M
@ $1406.07 · 2025-08-20
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.79M
@ $1597.86 · 2025-07-21
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.27M
@ $1424.27 · 2025-06-20
WYNNE SARAH
Chief Financial Officer
$2.61M
@ $1450.00 · 2025-06-13
WYNNE SARAH
Chief Financial Officer
$4.65M
@ $1452.15 · 2025-06-12
HENNESSY SEAN P
Director
$6.75M
@ $1436.52 · 2025-05-20
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.30M
@ $1434.35 · 2025-05-20
WARREN JESSICA L
General Counsel
$698,250
@ $1425.00 · 2025-05-13
REISS JOEL
Chief Operating Officer
$4.36M
@ $1321.80 · 2025-04-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TDG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
TDG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View INTC Full AnalysisView TDG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs TDG

Is Intel Corporation or TransDigm Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TDG trades at a -15.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $990 vs. price $1147), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or TransDigm Group Incorporated?▼

TDG scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is TransDigm Group Incorporated in financial distress?▼

TDG's Altman Z-Score of 2.0 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or TransDigm Group Incorporated?▼

TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) generates a 2.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or TransDigm Group Incorporated?▼

TDG earns 10.9% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs TDG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io