Compare StocksINTC vs SYY

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Sysco Corporation (SYY)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
SYY
Sysco Corporation
$74.05

Rewards

INTC
    SYY
    • Sysco Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Sysco Corporation scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    SYY
    • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • High leverage (6.70x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    SYY
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.87B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    5.28%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    20.57
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    14.93
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    13.98%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    79.58%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    18.54%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.00
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    6.70
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.96
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.97%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1SYY: 6
    INTCSYY

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    SYY

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SYY
    $-1.45
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.55B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-3.70B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SYY
    33.8% Overvalued
    Price is 33.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $74.05
    Fair Value: $55.34
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    SYY

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $74?

    +11.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +11.4%

    The market implies +11.7% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +11.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    SYY
    90/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SYY
    -2.60
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SYY
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,988
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SYY
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SYY
    0
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.13M
    TALTON SHEILA G
    Director
    $232,455
    @ $82.99 · 2026-02-02
    PHILLIPS RONALD L
    Officer
    $453,681
    @ $81.00 · 2026-01-27
    PHILLIPS RONALD L
    Officer
    $77,841
    @ $81.00 · 2025-09-11
    PHILLIPS RONALD L
    Officer
    $595,431
    @ $81.00 · 2025-09-02
    PHILLIPS RONALD L
    Officer
    $509,166
    @ $81.00 · 2025-08-13
    GUTIERREZ VICTORIA L
    Officer
    $10,807
    @ $80.65 · 2025-08-11
    PHILLIPS RONALD L
    Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $81.00 · 2025-07-23
    BERTRAND GREG D
    Officer
    $3.20M
    @ $80.00 · 2025-07-22
    TALTON SHEILA G
    Director
    $25,228
    @ $70.87 · 2025-05-01
    BERTRAND GREG D
    Officer
    $3.70M
    @ $77.00 · 2025-01-02
    BERTRAND GREG D
    Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $80.00 · 2024-12-04
    MCFADDEN EVE MANTELL
    General Counsel
    $519,920
    @ $80.00 · 2024-12-04
    TALTON SHEILA G
    Director
    $216,427
    @ $74.63 · 2024-11-19
    MCFADDEN EVE MANTELL
    General Counsel
    $303,104
    @ $75.10 · 2024-11-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SYY
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    SYY
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView SYY Full Analysis
    INTC vs SYY: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io