Compare StocksINTC vs STZ

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$152.82

Rewards

INTC
    STZ
    • Constellation Brands, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Constellation Brands, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $15.86 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    STZ
    • FCF yield of 7.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • PEG ratio of 2.83 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    STZ
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.05B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    7.78%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    15.90
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    12.26
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    9.83%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    20.11%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    51.65%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.83
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    1.34
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.28
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.70%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1STZ: 6
    INTCSTZ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    STZ

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    STZ
    $-14.53
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.23B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-17.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    STZ
    28.3% Overvalued
    Price is 28.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $152.82
    Fair Value: $119.07
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    STZ

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $153?

    +9.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.5%

    The market implies +9.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    STZ
    78/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by margin stability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    STZ
    -2.75
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    STZ
    Insiders 20.0%Institutions 79.6%Retail & Other 0.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,412
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    STZ
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $340,886
    BALDWIN CHRISTOPHER J.
    Director
    $340,886
    @ $170.44 · 2025-07-08
    GILES WILLIAM T
    Director
    $186,390
    @ $186.39 · 2025-01-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    STZ
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.13M
    HERNANDEZ ERNESTO M.
    Director
    $307,830
    @ $153.91 · 2026-04-27
    GLAETZER SAMUEL J
    Officer
    $85,345
    @ $153.77 · 2026-02-17
    BOURDEAU JAMES O
    Officer
    $138,749
    @ $169.00 · 2025-07-21
    GLAETZER SAMUEL J
    Officer
    $593,901
    @ $188.54 · 2025-05-13
    SER BUSINESS HOLDINGS LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $159,060
    @ $241.00 · 2024-11-20
    SABIA JAMES ANTHONY JR.
    President
    $8.77M
    @ $242.99 · 2024-11-14
    NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.09M
    @ $243.58 · 2024-11-14
    CAREY KANEENAT KRISTANN
    Officer
    $78,870
    @ $239.00 · 2024-11-13
    NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $237.24 · 2024-10-29
    GLAETZER SAMUEL J
    Officer
    $370,809
    @ $245.57 · 2024-10-14
    HANKINSON GARTH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.09M
    @ $240.10 · 2024-08-09
    MCCARTHY DANIEL J
    Director
    $468,009
    @ $252.43 · 2024-07-26
    CAREY KANEENAT KRISTANN
    Officer
    $254,997
    @ $261.00 · 2024-07-12
    NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.54M
    @ $261.54 · 2024-05-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    STZ
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    STZ
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView STZ Full Analysis
    INTC vs STZ: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io