Compare StocksINTC vs SO

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs The Southern Company (SO)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
SO
The Southern Company
$96.71

Rewards

INTC
    SO
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.41 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    SO
    • The Southern Company scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • PEG ratio of 2.75 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    SO
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-3.95B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    -3.62%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    24.73
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    19.66
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    5.31%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    10.88%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    48.00%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.75
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    1.90
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.37
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.14%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1SO: 5
    INTCSO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    SO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SO
    $5.15
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.71B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$19.12B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SO
    487.9% Overvalued
    Price is 487.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $96.71
    Fair Value: $16.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    SO

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    SO
    26/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SO
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SO
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 72.0%Retail & Other 27.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,771
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SO
    4
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.93M
    GREENE KIMBERLY S
    Officer
    $2.42M
    @ $96.67 · 2026-03-30
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $643,892
    @ $96.55 · 2026-03-19
    CONNALLY STANLEY W JR
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $97.13 · 2026-03-18
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $487,453
    @ $95.15 · 2026-02-24
    ANDERSON BRYAN D
    Officer
    $582,309
    @ $93.83 · 2025-09-30
    SPAINHOUR STERLING A. JR.
    Officer
    $226,148
    @ $95.02 · 2025-08-11
    GREENE KIMBERLY S
    Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $95.00 · 2025-07-21
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $89.54 · 2025-05-23
    CONNALLY STANLEY W JR
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $92.24 · 2025-03-31
    GREENE KIMBERLY S
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $93.12 · 2025-03-10
    DAVIS MARTIN BERNARD
    Chief Technology Officer
    $100,811
    @ $89.61 · 2025-03-03
    WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $90.13 · 2025-03-03
    WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $143,370
    @ $90.00 · 2025-02-25
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $81,184
    @ $86.00 · 2025-02-19
    PEOPLES JAMES JEFFREY
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $86.00 · 2025-02-11
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $69,739
    @ $83.32 · 2025-02-04
    DAVIS MARTIN BERNARD
    Chief Technology Officer
    $100,503
    @ $85.90 · 2024-12-05
    WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $86.18 · 2024-12-05
    SPAINHOUR STERLING A. JR.
    Officer
    $70,212
    @ $88.54 · 2024-11-04
    KERR JAMES Y. II
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.69M
    @ $89.64 · 2024-10-04
    ANDERSON BRYAN D
    Officer
    $587,830
    @ $89.54 · 2024-09-06
    SPAINHOUR STERLING A. JR.
    Officer
    $211,796
    @ $88.99 · 2024-08-05
    WILSON ANTHONY L
    Officer
    $535,509
    @ $77.61 · 2024-07-05
    DRAKE SLOANE N
    Officer
    $931,320
    @ $77.61 · 2024-07-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SO
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    SO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView SO Full Analysis
    INTC vs SO: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io