Compare StocksINTC vs SHW

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$318.00

Rewards

INTC
    SHW
    • The Sherwin-Williams Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • The Sherwin-Williams Company scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    SHW
    • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 4.08 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (3.30x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    SHW
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.14B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    2.73%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    30.58
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    23.95
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    14.07%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    57.97%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    49.04%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    4.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    3.30
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.16
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.01%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1SHW: 6
    INTCSHW

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    SHW

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SHW
    $3.42
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $5.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$18.82B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SHW
    29.6% Overvalued
    Price is 29.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $318.00
    Fair Value: $245.29
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    SHW

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $318?

    +15.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.3%

    The market implies +15.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    SHW
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SHW
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SHW
    Insiders 6.3%Institutions 83.3%Retail & Other 10.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,238
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SHW
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SHW
    1
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.03M
    YOUNG BRYAN J
    Officer
    $915,913
    @ $364.47 · 2026-02-24
    DAVIE COLIN M
    Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $359.50 · 2026-02-02
    BINNS JUSTIN T
    Officer
    $224,611
    @ $368.82 · 2025-08-25
    LANG JAMES P
    Officer
    $301,301
    @ $350.35 · 2025-08-06
    REA TODD D
    President
    $1.52M
    @ $359.16 · 2025-06-06
    DAVIE COLIN M
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $360.30 · 2025-02-27
    GARCEAU MARY L
    Officer
    $6.28M
    @ $397.92 · 2024-11-26
    CRONIN JANE M.
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $398.06 · 2024-11-25
    SOFISH GREGORY P
    Officer
    $971,186
    @ $378.63 · 2024-11-18
    MISTYSYN ALLEN J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.33M
    @ $366.83 · 2024-08-30
    MORIKIS JOHN G
    Officer and Director
    $42.28M
    @ $364.54 · 2024-08-30
    YOUNG BRYAN J
    Officer
    $650,000
    @ $354.61 · 2024-08-15
    CRONIN JANE M.
    Officer
    $3.27M
    @ $350.75 · 2024-07-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SHW
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(43/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    SHW
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView SHW Full Analysis
    INTC vs SHW: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io