Compare StocksINTC vs SBUX

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
$105.90

Rewards

INTC
    SBUX
    • Starbucks Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Starbucks Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Dividend yield of 2.34% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    SBUX
    • Gross margin of 21.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 80.8x is 130% above the historical average of 35.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • PEG ratio of 2.48 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    SBUX
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.30B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    -1.08%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    80.84
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    35.11
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    10.48%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    21.90%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.48
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.21
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.34%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1SBUX: 4
    INTCSBUX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    SBUX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SBUX
    $-9.28
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.95B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-18.13B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SBUX
    28.6% Overvalued
    Price is 28.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $105.90
    Fair Value: $82.37
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    SBUX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    SBUX
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SBUX
    -2.77
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SBUX
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.4%Retail & Other 15.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,888
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SBUX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $994,500
    KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
    Director
    $994,500
    @ $85.00 · 2025-11-10
    KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
    Director
    $34,770
    @ $91.50 · 2024-09-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SBUX
    6
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $877,464
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $210,000
    @ $105.00 · 2026-04-29
    BREWER BRADY
    Officer
    $58,800
    @ $100.00 · 2026-04-17
    BREWER BRADY
    Officer
    $147,690
    @ $90.00 · 2026-04-06
    BREWER BRADY
    Officer
    $58,800
    @ $100.00 · 2026-03-09
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $242,800
    @ $97.12 · 2026-03-05
    BREWER BRADY
    Officer
    $159,374
    @ $97.12 · 2026-03-05
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $1.94M
    @ $101.37 · 2024-11-29
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $148,414
    @ $99.54 · 2024-11-21
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $143,850
    @ $99.07 · 2024-11-15
    CONWAY MICHAEL AARON
    Officer
    $305,598
    @ $94.03 · 2024-08-15
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $299,916
    @ $91.16 · 2024-08-13
    CONWAY MICHAEL AARON
    Officer
    $260,000
    @ $80.00 · 2024-06-14
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $300,000
    @ $80.00 · 2024-05-22
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $19,375
    @ $77.50 · 2024-05-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SBUX
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    SBUX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView SBUX Full Analysis
    INTC vs SBUX: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io