Compare StocksINTC vs RVTY

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Revvity, Inc. (RVTY)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
RVTY
Revvity, Inc.
$86.68

Rewards

INTC
    RVTY
    • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Dividend yield of 0.32% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    RVTY
    • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • PEG ratio of 3.37 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $4.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    RVTY
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $523.28M
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    5.40%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    42.08
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    14.44
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    4.25%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    3.33%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    54.77%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    3.37
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.47
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.95
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.32%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1RVTY: 6
    INTCRVTY

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    RVTY

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RVTY
    $-6.21
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-6.85B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RVTY
    150.9% Overvalued
    Price is 150.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $86.68
    Fair Value: $34.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    RVTY

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $87?

    +20.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.8%

    The market implies +20.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    RVTY
    40/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RVTY
    -2.44
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RVTY
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 103.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders736
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RVTY
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RVTY
    5
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.74M
    GONZALES ANITA
    Officer
    $7,424
    @ $92.80 · 2026-04-20
    VICTOR MIRIAME
    Officer
    $180,856
    @ $97.13 · 2026-02-24
    MCMURRY-HEATH MICHELLE
    Director
    $58,356
    @ $97.26 · 2026-02-23
    SINGH PRAHLAD R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $100.21 · 2026-02-05
    GOLDBERG JOEL S
    General Counsel
    $1.27M
    @ $100.21 · 2026-02-05
    VOHRA TAJINDER S
    Officer
    $601,502
    @ $104.50 · 2026-02-02
    MCMURRY-HEATH MICHELLE
    Director
    $55,299
    @ $92.17 · 2025-05-29
    MCMURRY-HEATH MICHELLE
    Director
    $235,395
    @ $119.49 · 2025-02-06
    GOLDBERG JOEL S
    Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $126.73 · 2025-01-30
    VOHRA TAJINDER S
    Officer
    $641,543
    @ $116.81 · 2025-01-07
    SINGH PRAHLAD R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.13M
    @ $116.22 · 2024-12-02
    VOHRA TAJINDER S
    Officer
    $262,202
    @ $121.73 · 2024-10-09
    VOHRA TAJINDER S
    Officer
    $526,910
    @ $122.34 · 2024-10-08
    GOLDBERG JOEL S
    General Counsel
    $412,507
    @ $117.86 · 2024-08-07
    GOLDBERG JOEL S
    General Counsel
    $441,844
    @ $110.46 · 2024-06-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RVTY
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(31/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    RVTY
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView RVTY Full Analysis
    INTC vs RVTY: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io