Compare StocksINTC vs RSG

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Republic Services, Inc. (RSG)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
$223.02

Rewards

INTC
    RSG
    • Republic Services, Inc. scores 76/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.36 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    RSG
    • PEG ratio of 4.40 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    RSG
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.41B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    3.49%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    32.56
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    27.72
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    9.91%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    17.87%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    43.01%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    4.40
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.15
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.67
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.12%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1RSG: 6
    INTCRSG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    RSG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RSG
    $6.36
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.85B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$24.50B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RSG
    63.4% Overvalued
    Price is 63.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $223.02
    Fair Value: $136.47
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    RSG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $223?

    +16.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.1%

    The market implies +16.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    RSG
    76/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RSG
    -2.74
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RSG
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 96.9%Retail & Other 2.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,819
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RSG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.10M
    WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
    Director
    $100,122
    @ $209.46 · 2025-12-09
    CASCADE INVESTMENT, L.L.C.
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $1.00M
    @ $234.91 · 2025-08-19
    WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
    Director
    $100,040
    @ $185.26 · 2024-06-04
    VOLPE SANDRA M
    Director
    $14,803
    @ $187.38 · 2024-05-15
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RSG
    0
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.78M
    BRUMMER GREGG
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $233.94 · 2025-08-22
    CARLSEN ELYSE
    Officer
    $59,495
    @ $253.17 · 2025-06-05
    RICHARDSON LARSON
    Officer
    $525,954
    @ $239.07 · 2025-03-03
    BRUMMER GREGG
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.44M
    @ $228.20 · 2025-02-19
    WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
    Director
    $400,187
    @ $215.27 · 2024-12-05
    DELGHIACCIO BRIAN M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $210.02 · 2024-11-19
    COLLINS TOMAGO
    Director
    $649,625
    @ $203.01 · 2024-08-16
    HODGES AMANDA
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $186.02 · 2024-05-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RSG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    RSG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView RSG Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io