Compare StocksINTC vs ROST

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
ROST
Ross Stores, Inc.
$210.66

Rewards

INTC
    ROST
    • Ross Stores, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Ross Stores, Inc. scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    ROST
    • FCF yield of 2.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 10 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    ROST
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.66B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    2.42%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    31.87
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    26.05
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    19.34%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    34.67%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    27.71%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    2.77
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.84
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.19
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.84%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1ROST: 6
    INTCROST

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    ROST

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ROST
    $4.49
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $4.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$18.41B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ROST
    65.7% Overvalued
    Price is 65.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $210.66
    Fair Value: $127.14
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    ROST

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $211?

    +17.7%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    ROST
    84/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ROST
    -2.41
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ROST
    Insiders 2.2%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,634
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ROST
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    FLEMING KAREN
    Officer
    $5,230
    @ $149.43 · 2024-04-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ROST
    1
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $13.55M
    SYKES-DICK KAREN
    Officer
    $546,755
    @ $213.91 · 2026-03-10
    BRINKLEY STEPHEN C
    Officer
    $971,794
    @ $150.97 · 2025-10-08
    FLEMING KAREN
    Officer
    $437,142
    @ $149.09 · 2025-09-25
    CONROY JAMES GRANT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.75M
    @ $146.00 · 2025-09-24
    SYKES-DICK KAREN
    Officer
    $607,058
    @ $151.76 · 2025-09-04
    FLEMING KAREN
    Officer
    $151,059
    @ $151.06 · 2025-09-03
    SYKES-DICK KAREN
    Officer
    $657,111
    @ $130.48 · 2025-04-02
    BALMUTH MICHAEL
    Officer and Director
    $1.48M
    @ $131.60 · 2025-04-02
    FLEMING KAREN
    Officer
    $672,979
    @ $127.70 · 2025-03-31
    HARTSHORN MICHAEL J.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.28M
    @ $128.50 · 2025-03-25
    FLEMING KAREN
    Officer
    $671,272
    @ $125.73 · 2025-03-17
    HARTSHORN MICHAEL J.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.30M
    @ $155.64 · 2024-09-16
    BALMUTH MICHAEL
    Officer and Director
    $2.27M
    @ $152.22 · 2024-09-05
    RENTLER BARBARA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.52M
    @ $153.93 · 2024-08-27
    RENDA LARREE M
    Director
    $616,405
    @ $147.89 · 2024-03-28
    KOBAYASHI MICHAEL K
    President
    $2.04M
    @ $147.46 · 2024-03-28
    MORROW BRIAN R
    Officer
    $1.57M
    @ $146.00 · 2024-03-27
    HARTSHORN MICHAEL J.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.78M
    @ $146.39 · 2024-03-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ROST
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(66/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    ROST
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView ROST Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io