Compare StocksINTC vs RMD

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs ResMed Inc. (RMD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. RMD is undervalued at $189, with an intrinsic value of $253 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, RMD has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
RMD
ResMed Inc.
$188.63

Rewards

INTC
    RMD
    • ResMed Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 62.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ResMed Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    RMD
    • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $3.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    RMD
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.45B
    -1.23%
    FCF Yield
    5.29%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    18.17
    86.70
    Forward P/E
    15.56
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    21.07%
    -2.91%
    ROE
    25.25%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    62.18%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.14
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.10
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.39
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.25%
    INTC: 0Ties: 1RMD: 10
    INTCRMD

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    RMD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RMD
    $1.94
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.47B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$4.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RMD
    25.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 25.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $188.63
    Fair Value: $252.97
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    RMD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $189?

    +5.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.5%

    The market implies +5.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    RMD
    96/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RMD
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RMD
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 70.0%Retail & Other 29.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,432
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RMD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RMD
    5
    Sells (3M)
    38
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $29.18M
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $968,064
    @ $193.96 · 2026-06-08
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $207.82 · 2026-05-07
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $225.50 · 2026-04-07
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $224,310
    @ $224.31 · 2026-04-01
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $450,000
    @ $225.00 · 2026-04-01
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $251.03 · 2026-03-09
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $520,440
    @ $260.22 · 2026-03-04
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $254,300
    @ $254.30 · 2026-03-02
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $273.78 · 2026-02-09
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $502,620
    @ $251.31 · 2026-02-04
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $13,000
    @ $260.00 · 2026-02-04
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $257,030
    @ $257.03 · 2026-02-02
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $497,660
    @ $248.83 · 2026-01-07
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $248.46 · 2026-01-07
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $241,750
    @ $241.75 · 2026-01-02
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $12,088
    @ $241.76 · 2026-01-02
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $251.41 · 2025-12-08
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $502,940
    @ $251.47 · 2025-12-03
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $244,160
    @ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $12,208
    @ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
    DE WITTE JAN
    Director
    $524,025
    @ $255.00 · 2025-11-25
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $504,100
    @ $252.05 · 2025-11-12
    DE WITTE JAN
    Director
    $121,872
    @ $250.25 · 2025-11-11
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $249.75 · 2025-11-07
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $742,620
    @ $247.54 · 2025-11-03
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.27M
    @ $282.85 · 2025-10-07
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $823,080
    @ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $27,436
    @ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
    FARRELL MICHAEL J.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.23M
    @ $278.14 · 2025-09-08
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $812,310
    @ $270.77 · 2025-09-02
    HERNANDEZ JOHN
    Director
    $739,289
    @ $287.10 · 2025-08-18
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.24M
    @ $279.48 · 2025-08-07
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $845,700
    @ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $14,095
    @ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.06M
    @ $256.72 · 2025-07-07
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $241,438
    @ $255.49 · 2025-07-02
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $997,892
    @ $256.99 · 2025-07-01
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $16,961
    @ $256.98 · 2025-07-01
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $251.21 · 2025-06-09
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $494,640
    @ $247.32 · 2025-06-04
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $243,780
    @ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $9,995
    @ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $891,286
    @ $244.59 · 2025-05-22
    DE WITTE JAN
    Director
    $486,940
    @ $243.47 · 2025-05-20
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $484,500
    @ $242.25 · 2025-05-07
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $243.23 · 2025-05-07
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $215,580
    @ $215.58 · 2025-04-08
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $209.85 · 2025-04-07
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $439,480
    @ $219.74 · 2025-04-02
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $14,263
    @ $222.86 · 2025-04-01
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $230,360
    @ $230.36 · 2025-03-10
    GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $239.31 · 2025-03-10
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.84M
    @ $229.20 · 2025-03-07
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $455,420
    @ $227.71 · 2025-03-05
    GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
    Officer
    $2.15M
    @ $235.40 · 2025-03-03
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $14,982
    @ $234.09 · 2025-03-03
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $238,980
    @ $238.98 · 2025-02-10
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.90M
    @ $236.77 · 2025-02-07
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $484,220
    @ $242.11 · 2025-02-05
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $15,515
    @ $242.42 · 2025-02-03
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $234,040
    @ $234.04 · 2025-01-08
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $461,980
    @ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $17,324
    @ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $244,230
    @ $244.23 · 2024-12-09
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $491,300
    @ $245.65 · 2024-12-04
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $18,419
    @ $248.91 · 2024-12-02
    LEONG JUSTIN
    Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $243.09 · 2024-11-22
    DE WITTE JAN
    Director
    $198,053
    @ $248.81 · 2024-11-12
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,000
    @ $249.00 · 2024-11-08
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.62M
    @ $246.26 · 2024-11-07
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $497,480
    @ $248.74 · 2024-11-06
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $16,698
    @ $242.00 · 2024-11-01
    GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $238.48 · 2024-10-11
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $233,470
    @ $233.47 · 2024-10-08
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.41M
    @ $231.91 · 2024-10-07
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $474,400
    @ $237.20 · 2024-10-02
    GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
    Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $252.56 · 2024-09-12
    SANDERCOCK BRETT
    Chief Financial Officer
    $246,420
    @ $246.42 · 2024-09-09
    FARRELL MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.65M
    @ $248.38 · 2024-09-09
    FARRELL PETER CRAIG
    Director
    $479,800
    @ $239.90 · 2024-09-04
    RIDER MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $203,742
    @ $231.00 · 2024-08-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RMD
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(31/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    RMD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView RMD Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs RMD

    Is Intel Corporation or ResMed Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, RMD trades at a 25.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $253 vs. price $189), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or ResMed Inc.?

    RMD scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RMD scores 12.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or ResMed Inc.?

    ResMed Inc. (RMD) generates a 5.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or ResMed Inc.?

    RMD earns 21.1% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.