Compare StocksINTC vs RL

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$340.21

Rewards

INTC
    RL
    • Ralph Lauren Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 69.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Ralph Lauren Corporation scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    RL
    • Insiders have sold $17.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    RL
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.02B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    4.94%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.14
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    18.95
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    21.63%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    25.72%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    69.65%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.93
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.99
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.44
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.07%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1RL: 7
    INTCRL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    RL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RL
    $10.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.32B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$14.35B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RL
    14.6% Overvalued
    Price is 14.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $340.21
    Fair Value: $296.92
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    RL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $340?

    +12.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.3%

    The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    RL
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RL
    -2.79
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RL
    Insiders 4.0%Institutions 103.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,086
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RL
    2
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $28.56M
    ALAGOZ HALIDE
    Officer
    $405,440
    @ $362.00 · 2026-03-04
    LOUVET PATRICE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.65M
    @ $354.22 · 2026-02-10
    ALAGOZ HALIDE
    Officer
    $688,812
    @ $366.00 · 2025-12-02
    ALAGOZ HALIDE
    Officer
    $740,829
    @ $317.00 · 2025-09-04
    ALAGOZ HALIDE
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $295.00 · 2025-08-27
    RANFTL ROBERT P
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.26M
    @ $282.03 · 2025-08-19
    LOUVET PATRICE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $240.00 · 2025-05-05
    LOUVET PATRICE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.44M
    @ $232.50 · 2025-03-24
    ALAGOZ HALIDE
    Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $285.00 · 2025-02-18
    LOUVET PATRICE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.45M
    @ $227.16 · 2024-12-11
    LAUREN DAVID R
    Officer and Director
    $8.32M
    @ $221.14 · 2024-11-08
    NIELSEN JANE HAMILTON
    Chief Operating Officer
    $11.52M
    @ $171.25 · 2024-05-24
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    RL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView RL Full Analysis