Compare StocksINTC vs RJF

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
$156.20

Rewards

INTC
    RJF
    • Gross margin of 93.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Raymond James Financial, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.45 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    RJF
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.62 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $5.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    RJF
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    14.75
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    11.67
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    12.31%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    16.94%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    93.01%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    0.96
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.46
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.38%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1RJF: 5
    INTCRJF

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    RJF

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RJF
    $1.84
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $4.79B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RJF
    57.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $156.20
    Fair Value: $367.73
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    RJF

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    RJF
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RJF
    -2.56
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RJF
    Insiders 10.4%Institutions 80.3%Retail & Other 9.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,281
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RJF
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RJF
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.26M
    ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
    Officer
    $4.21M
    @ $142.34 · 2026-03-19
    SANTELLI JONATHAN N
    General Counsel
    $767,079
    @ $170.46 · 2026-02-04
    REILLY PAUL C
    Officer and Director
    $21.32M
    @ $163.15 · 2025-12-15
    ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
    Officer
    $963,228
    @ $146.61 · 2025-05-29
    BUNN JAMES E.
    Officer
    $498,184
    @ $136.49 · 2025-04-28
    SANTELLI JONATHAN N
    General Counsel
    $699,932
    @ $168.25 · 2025-01-31
    ELWYN TASHTEGO S
    Officer
    $1.59M
    @ $159.47 · 2024-12-13
    SANTELLI JONATHAN N
    General Counsel
    $513,318
    @ $165.59 · 2024-12-05
    CARTER HORACE
    Officer
    $825,147
    @ $165.03 · 2024-12-04
    REID SHANNON B
    Officer
    $205,141
    @ $165.30 · 2024-12-04
    LARSON KATHERINE H.
    Officer
    $247,691
    @ $166.01 · 2024-12-03
    ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
    Officer
    $769,791
    @ $166.59 · 2024-12-03
    RANEY STEVEN M
    Officer
    $2.34M
    @ $169.02 · 2024-12-02
    REILLY PAUL C
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.37M
    @ $167.30 · 2024-12-02
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RJF
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    RJF
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView RJF Full Analysis
    INTC vs RJF: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io