SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › INTC vs REGN

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, INTC is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. REGN is overvalued at $928, with an intrinsic value of $730 and a margin of safety of -27%. Of the two, REGN has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76
VS
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$927.89

Rewards

INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
REGN
  • ★Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 7.56 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -1.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
REGN
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 7.3 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.15 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
REGN
Valuation
$670.37M
Free Cash Flow
$3.77B
0.19%
FCF Yield
3.92%
N/A
Trailing P/E
20.51
35.50
Forward P/E
13.73
Quality & Moat
4.06%
ROIC
14.92%
-9.62%
ROE
14.95%
40.15%
Gross Margin
46.73%
1.36
PEG Ratio
1.58
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.17
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.41%
INTC: 1Ties: 1REGN: 9
INTCREGN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

REGN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
REGN
$0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$12.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
REGN
27.0% Overvalued
Price is 27.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $927.89
Fair Value: $730.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

REGN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $928?

+7.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.0%

The market implies +7.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
REGN
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
REGN
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
REGN
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,986
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
REGN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
REGN
4
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.65M
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$2.00M
@ $853.56 · 2026-09-03
GUARINI KATHRYN PH.D.
Director
$340,000
@ $850.00 · 2026-09-02
ZOGHBI HUDA Y
Director
$640,000
@ $800.00 · 2026-08-10
GUARINI KATHRYN PH.D.
Director
$320,000
@ $800.00 · 2026-08-10
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$130,030
@ $650.15 · 2026-07-02
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$70,524
@ $705.24 · 2026-05-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$77,727
@ $777.27 · 2026-04-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$78,550
@ $785.50 · 2026-03-02
ZOGHBI HUDA Y
Director
$1.28M
@ $781.33 · 2026-02-19
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$1.59M
@ $778.52 · 2026-02-09
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$77,853
@ $778.53 · 2026-02-09
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$1.20M
@ $800.00 · 2026-01-07
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$570,000
@ $750.00 · 2025-11-20
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$280,766
@ $651.43 · 2025-11-07
POON CHRISTINE A
Director
$4.25M
@ $654.27 · 2025-10-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
REGN
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
REGN
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View INTC Full AnalysisView REGN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs REGN

Is Intel Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, REGN trades at a -27.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $730 vs. price $928), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

REGN scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. REGN scores 7.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) generates a 3.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

REGN earns 14.9% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs REGN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io