Compare Stocks › INTC vs Q

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTC is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Q is undervalued at $117, with an intrinsic value of $153 and a margin of safety of 24%. Of the two, Q has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$116.67

Rewards

INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
Q

    Risks

    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Q
      Valuation
      $670.37M
      Free Cash Flow
      $772.25M
      0.19%
      FCF Yield
      3.16%
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      41.67
      35.50
      Forward P/E
      21.22
      Quality & Moat
      4.06%
      ROIC
      7.61%
      -9.62%
      ROE
      6.72%
      40.15%
      Gross Margin
      46.22%
      1.36
      PEG Ratio
      1.19
      Balance Sheet Safety
      Net cash
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.47
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      -0.20
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.34
      0.00%
      Dividend Yield
      0.27%
      INTC: 2Ties: 1Q: 8
      INTCQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $65.76
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      18.3% Margin of Safety
      Price is 18.3% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $116.67
      Fair Value: $142.77
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTC

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

      +54.7%
      Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

      Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $117?

      +15.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.8%

      The market implies +15.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTC
      -2.83
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,439
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 21.1%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,671
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      1
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $10.25M
      TAN LIP-BU
      Chief Executive Officer
      $10.00M
      @ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $7.47M
      CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
      Chief Technology Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $4.01M
      @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(26/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(39/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTC
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
      Q
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
      View INTC Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs Q

      Is Intel Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, Q trades at a 23.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $153 vs. price $117), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?▼

      Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

      INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. Q scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?▼

      Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 3.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?▼

      Q earns 7.6% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      INTC vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io