Compare StocksINTC vs PYPL

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
$44.19

Rewards

INTC
    PYPL
    • PayPal Holdings, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • PayPal Holdings, Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Share count has been reduced by 19% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PYPL
    • 6 insider sales totaling $3.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PYPL
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $5.56B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    13.46%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    8.17
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    7.60
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    14.08%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    25.83%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    41.48%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.21
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.28
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.27%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1PYPL: 7
    INTCPYPL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PYPL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PYPL
    $-2.02
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $13.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-27.20B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PYPL
    65.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $44.19
    Fair Value: $127.12
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PYPL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $44?

    -4.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -5.5%

    The market implies -4.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -5.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PYPL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PYPL
    -2.54
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PYPL
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.3%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,425
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PYPL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PYPL
    6
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.17M
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $621,984
    @ $46.02 · 2026-03-03
    NATALI CHRIS
    Officer
    $98,764
    @ $44.73 · 2026-03-03
    KELLER FRANK
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $46.02 · 2026-03-03
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $41.49 · 2026-02-18
    NATALI CHRIS
    Officer
    $49,114
    @ $40.49 · 2026-02-17
    KELLER FRANK
    Officer
    $139,816
    @ $40.20 · 2026-02-06
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $249,057
    @ $59.84 · 2025-11-19
    WEBSTER AARON JAMES
    Officer
    $615,310
    @ $66.29 · 2025-11-10
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $860,935
    @ $68.87 · 2025-11-03
    SCOTTI DIEGO
    Officer
    $264,702
    @ $68.97 · 2025-10-30
    NATALI CHRIS
    Officer
    $94,987
    @ $69.13 · 2025-10-30
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $347,622
    @ $69.52 · 2025-10-30
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $288,792
    @ $69.39 · 2025-08-19
    SCOTTI DIEGO
    Officer
    $265,285
    @ $69.12 · 2025-07-31
    NATALI CHRIS
    Officer
    $492,529
    @ $69.35 · 2025-07-31
    SCOTTI DIEGO
    Officer
    $281,158
    @ $73.24 · 2025-06-06
    MESSEMER DEBORAH M
    Director
    $277,036
    @ $73.00 · 2025-06-06
    KEREERE SUZAN
    Officer
    $304,827
    @ $73.24 · 2025-06-06
    MCGOVERN GAIL J
    Director
    $176,479
    @ $72.15 · 2025-02-27
    MESSEMER DEBORAH M
    Director
    $272,616
    @ $61.65 · 2024-05-24
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PYPL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    PYPL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PYPL Full Analysis