Compare StocksINTC vs PRU

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$96.93
VS
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
$97.84

Rewards

INTC
    PRU
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $18.55 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • 3 insider purchases with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
    • FCF yield of 37.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PRU
    • Prudential Financial, Inc. scores only 15/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.17 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PRU
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $12.62B
    -1.70%
    FCF Yield
    37.06%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    9.79
    64.99
    Forward P/E
    6.65
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    6.30%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    10.05%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    29.60%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.03
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    1.24
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.63
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    5.53%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1PRU: 7
    INTCPRU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PRU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PRU
    $0.92
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $3.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.88B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $96.93
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PRU
    57.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $97.84
    Fair Value: $232.54
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PRU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $98?

    -1.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -21.0%

    The market implies -1.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -21.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PRU
    15/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PRU
    -2.12
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PRU
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 63.0%Retail & Other 36.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,783
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PRU
    3
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $168,840
    STODDARD THOMAS D
    Director
    $25,742
    @ $102.97 · 2026-02-17
    WOLK JOSEPH J
    Director
    $42,128
    @ $105.32 · 2026-02-11
    CHAPPUIS JACQUES P
    Officer
    $100,970
    @ $100.97 · 2026-02-06
    DI SIBIO CARMINE
    Director
    $22,208
    @ $111.04 · 2025-02-20
    FEENEY CAROLINE
    Officer
    $42,364
    @ $116.38 · 2024-12-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PRU
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.23M
    FEENEY CAROLINE
    Officer
    $762,215
    @ $116.28 · 2025-12-11
    SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
    Officer
    $861,520
    @ $107.69 · 2025-12-02
    LOWREY CHARLES F
    Chairman of the Board
    $5.17M
    @ $107.39 · 2025-11-10
    KAPPLER ANN M
    General Counsel
    $438,600
    @ $109.65 · 2025-08-29
    SULLIVAN ANDREW F
    Officer
    $635,880
    @ $105.98 · 2025-03-12
    TODMAN MICHAEL A
    Director
    $333,291
    @ $112.98 · 2025-02-07
    SULLIVAN ANDREW F
    Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $124.10 · 2024-11-07
    LOWREY CHARLES F
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.45M
    @ $126.29 · 2024-11-07
    FALZON ROBERT M
    Officer
    $6.76M
    @ $128.26 · 2024-11-06
    FEENEY CAROLINE
    Officer
    $133,167
    @ $119.97 · 2024-09-03
    KAPPLER ANN M
    General Counsel
    $322,028
    @ $113.43 · 2024-08-21
    FALZON ROBERT M
    Officer
    $15.43M
    @ $118.57 · 2024-05-13
    SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
    Officer
    $604,934
    @ $116.58 · 2024-05-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(72/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PRU
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
    PRU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PRU Full Analysis