Compare StocksINTC vs PPL

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs PPL Corporation (PPL)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
PPL
PPL Corporation
$37.65

Rewards

INTC
    PPL
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.48 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • PEG ratio of 0.47 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PPL
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.96 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PPL
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.33B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    -4.72%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.68
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    17.81
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    3.92%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    7.94%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    43.48%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.47
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.31
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.20
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.03%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1PPL: 5
    INTCPPL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PPL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PPL
    $8.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $564.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$4.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PPL
    244.0% Overvalued
    Price is 244.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $37.65
    Fair Value: $10.94
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PPL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PPL
    43/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PPL
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PPL
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.8%Retail & Other 12.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,268
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PPL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PPL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $991,542
    CROCKETT JOHN R III
    Officer
    $577,319
    @ $36.56 · 2025-08-27
    BONENBERGER DAVID J
    Officer
    $77,637
    @ $35.86 · 2025-07-29
    HENNINGER TADD J
    Officer and Treasurer
    $37,638
    @ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
    BONENBERGER DAVID J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $61,810
    @ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
    MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
    Officer
    $10,704
    @ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
    GOSMAN ANGELA K
    Officer
    $226,434
    @ $34.66 · 2025-05-23
    MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
    Officer
    $39,858
    @ $34.78 · 2025-02-28
    HENNINGER TADD J
    Officer and Treasurer
    $76,117
    @ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
    BONENBERGER DAVID J
    Officer
    $153,149
    @ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
    HENNINGER TADD J
    Officer and Treasurer
    $258,528
    @ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
    BONENBERGER DAVID J
    Officer
    $573,402
    @ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
    HENNINGER TADD J
    Officer and Treasurer
    $47,676
    @ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
    BONENBERGER DAVID J
    Officer
    $32,844
    @ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
    CROCKETT JOHN R III
    Officer
    $52,628
    @ $33.12 · 2025-01-27
    HENNINGER TADD J
    Officer and Treasurer
    $213,510
    @ $32.16 · 2024-12-17
    CROCKETT JOHN R III
    Officer
    $314,680
    @ $34.35 · 2024-11-21
    HENNINGER TADD J
    Officer and Treasurer
    $151,781
    @ $31.74 · 2024-08-29
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PPL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    PPL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PPL Full Analysis