Compare StocksINTC vs POOL

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Pool Corporation (POOL)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
POOL
Pool Corporation
$204.36

Rewards

INTC
    POOL
    • Pool Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Pool Corporation scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    POOL
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    POOL
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $309.52M
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    4.07%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    18.84
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    17.18
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    8.18%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    34.29%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    29.73%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.30
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.27
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.45%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1POOL: 5
    INTCPOOL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    POOL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    POOL
    $-4.14
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $831.9M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-3.44B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    POOL
    1.6% Overvalued
    Price is 1.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $204.36
    Fair Value: $201.23
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    POOL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $204?

    +9.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.9%

    The market implies +9.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    POOL
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    POOL
    -2.15
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    POOL
    Insiders 11.9%Institutions 94.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders918
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    POOL
    4
    Buys (3M)
    8
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.67M
    PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $205.00 · 2026-03-13
    PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
    Director
    $1.09M
    @ $218.00 · 2026-03-02
    HOPE JAMES D
    Director
    $300,162
    @ $213.64 · 2026-02-25
    ST ROMAIN KENNETH G
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $218.67 · 2026-02-23
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $8,996
    @ $243.14 · 2025-11-26
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $8,932
    @ $319.00 · 2025-08-28
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $9,005
    @ $300.17 · 2025-05-29
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $8,164
    @ $326.56 · 2025-03-26
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $7,966
    @ $379.33 · 2024-11-27
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $8,119
    @ $353.00 · 2024-08-29
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $8,148
    @ $354.26 · 2024-05-30
    WHALEN DAVID G
    Director
    $6,969
    @ $409.94 · 2024-03-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    POOL
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.22M
    HART MELANIE M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $605,000
    @ $220.00 · 2026-02-24
    ARVAN PETER D.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $245.57 · 2025-12-02
    NEIL JENNIFER M
    Officer
    $385,245
    @ $315.00 · 2025-03-31
    PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
    Director
    $9.58M
    @ $348.41 · 2025-02-25
    PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
    Director
    $3.46M
    @ $346.00 · 2025-02-24
    HOUSEY HART MELANIE MONROE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $799,006
    @ $345.59 · 2025-02-24
    NEIL JENNIFER M
    General Counsel
    $256,251
    @ $373.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    POOL
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(19/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    POOL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (19)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView POOL Full Analysis