Compare StocksINTC vs PODD

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Insulet Corporation (PODD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. PODD is undervalued at $146, with an intrinsic value of $194 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, PODD has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
PODD
Insulet Corporation
$145.76

Rewards

INTC
    PODD
    • Gross margin of 71.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.09 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • Insiders have bought $0.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    PODD

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTC
      PODD
      Valuation
      $-8.30B
      Free Cash Flow
      $349.90M
      -1.23%
      FCF Yield
      3.47%
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      33.98
      86.64
      Forward P/E
      18.04
      Quality & Moat
      1.72%
      ROIC
      15.86%
      -2.91%
      ROE
      23.00%
      37.20%
      Gross Margin
      71.01%
      1.36
      PEG Ratio
      1.29
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.10
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.41
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.86
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.89
      0.00%
      Dividend Yield
      0.00%
      INTC: 1Ties: 2PODD: 8
      INTCPODD

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      PODD

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      PODD
      $-0.52
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $871.7M
      Δ Market Cap
      $-455.5M
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $133.99
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      PODD
      25.0% Margin of Safety
      Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $145.76
      Fair Value: $194.46
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      PODD

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $146?

      +18.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +13.4%

      The market implies +18.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      PODD
      55/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTC
      -2.83
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      PODD
      -2.51
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,359
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      PODD
      Insiders 0.3%Institutions 105.5%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,172
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $249,985
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,946
      @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      PODD
      2
      Buys (3M)
      4
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.70M
      WEATHERMAN ELIZABETH H
      Director
      $497,490
      @ $144.20 · 2026-06-03
      STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
      Director
      $400,393
      @ $143.51 · 2026-06-03
      MINOGUE MICHAEL R
      Director
      $499,847
      @ $246.23 · 2026-02-25
      STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
      Director
      $299,884
      @ $311.73 · 2025-12-05
      CHADWICK ANA MARIA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $20,600
      @ $206.00 · 2024-08-29
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      2
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $7.47M
      CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
      Chief Technology Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $4.01M
      @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      PODD
      1
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $2.97M
      BORIO LUCIANA
      Director
      $59,887
      @ $143.27 · 2026-06-03
      FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
      Director
      $542,510
      @ $293.09 · 2025-12-15
      SINGH PREM
      Officer
      $238,726
      @ $347.49 · 2025-09-08
      COUSIN LAETITIA
      Officer
      $278,002
      @ $348.81 · 2025-09-08
      BENJAMIN ERIC
      Officer
      $1.42M
      @ $332.23 · 2025-08-21
      SINGH PREM
      Officer
      $429,760
      @ $320.00 · 2025-08-07
      MANEA DANIEL
      Officer
      $390,065
      @ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
      SINGH PREM
      Officer
      $698,216
      @ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
      BORIO LUCIANA
      Director
      $147,056
      @ $305.73 · 2025-06-09
      KAPPLES JOHN W.
      General Counsel
      $1.68M
      @ $318.47 · 2025-05-14
      HOPFIELD JESSICA
      Director
      $1.66M
      @ $317.54 · 2025-05-13
      BENJAMIN ERIC
      Officer
      $960,320
      @ $320.00 · 2025-05-13
      FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
      Director
      $501,875
      @ $275.00 · 2025-03-25
      BENJAMIN ERIC
      Officer
      $3.47M
      @ $280.00 · 2025-01-21
      BENJAMIN ERIC
      Officer
      $1.17M
      @ $267.60 · 2024-12-16
      BUDDEN LAUREN
      Officer
      $252,192
      @ $275.62 · 2024-12-10
      BORIO LUCIANA
      Director
      $139,598
      @ $274.80 · 2024-11-12
      HOPFIELD JESSICA
      Director
      $1.72M
      @ $225.26 · 2024-09-11
      SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
      Director
      $1.13M
      @ $225.84 · 2024-09-10
      BUDDEN LAUREN
      Officer
      $333,443
      @ $221.41 · 2024-09-09
      FIELD MARK N
      Chief Technology Officer
      $305,463
      @ $220.87 · 2024-09-09
      SINGH PREM
      Officer
      $368,940
      @ $202.27 · 2024-08-30
      FIELD MARK N
      Chief Technology Officer
      $281,561
      @ $203.00 · 2024-08-28
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(65/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      PODD
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(30/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
      PODD
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
      View INTC Full AnalysisView PODD Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs PODD

      Is Intel Corporation or Insulet Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, PODD trades at a 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $194 vs. price $146), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Insulet Corporation?

      PODD scores 55/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

      INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PODD scores 9.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Insulet Corporation?

      Insulet Corporation (PODD) generates a 3.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Insulet Corporation?

      PODD earns 15.9% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.