Compare StocksINTC vs PM

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$166.38

Rewards

INTC
    PM
    • Philip Morris International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 67.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Philip Morris International Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PM
    • 5 insider sales totaling $27.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PM
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.58B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    3.31%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.43
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    18.21
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    22.73%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    67.28%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.90
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.50
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.53%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1PM: 5
    INTCPM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PM
    $64.75
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.43B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$92.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PM
    23.1% Overvalued
    Price is 23.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $166.38
    Fair Value: $135.14
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $166?

    +11.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.6%

    The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PM
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PM
    -2.39
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PM
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 83.2%Retail & Other 16.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,375
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PM
    5
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.72M
    KENNEDY STACEY
    Officer
    $2.63M
    @ $183.13 · 2026-02-20
    BABEAU EMMANUEL
    Officer
    $6.14M
    @ $181.61 · 2026-02-19
    GUERIN YANN
    Officer
    $726,760
    @ $181.69 · 2026-02-19
    OLCZAK JACEK
    Officer and Director
    $14.57M
    @ $182.18 · 2026-02-19
    DE WILDE FREDERIC J
    Officer
    $3.65M
    @ $182.58 · 2026-02-19
    DAHLGREN LARS
    Officer
    $562,740
    @ $152.96 · 2025-03-06
    ANDOLINA MASSIMO
    Officer
    $2.73M
    @ $156.05 · 2025-02-24
    BARTH WERNER
    Officer
    $1.49M
    @ $148.67 · 2025-02-20
    BABEAU EMMANUEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.47M
    @ $148.85 · 2025-02-20
    GUERIN YANN
    General Counsel
    $378,200
    @ $151.28 · 2025-02-20
    CALANTZOPOULOS ANDRE
    Chairman of the Board
    $6.06M
    @ $149.06 · 2025-02-20
    OLCZAK JACEK
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.95M
    @ $148.87 · 2025-02-20
    DE WILDE FREDERIC J
    Officer
    $2.17M
    @ $144.54 · 2025-02-07
    VOLPETTI STEFANO
    Officer
    $1.32M
    @ $132.48 · 2024-10-31
    BARTH WERNER
    Officer
    $974,850
    @ $129.98 · 2024-10-23
    CALANTZOPOULOS ANDRE
    Chairman of the Board
    $13.23M
    @ $129.85 · 2024-10-23
    DE WILDE FREDERIC J
    Officer
    $3.27M
    @ $130.96 · 2024-10-23
    DE WILDE FREDERIC J
    Officer
    $2.39M
    @ $119.30 · 2024-08-22
    ANDOLINA MASSIMO
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $115.35 · 2024-08-08
    DE WILDE FREDERIC J
    Officer
    $2.26M
    @ $113.01 · 2024-07-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    PM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PM Full Analysis
    INTC vs PM: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io