Compare Stocks › INTC vs PLTR

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTC is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. PLTR is overvalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $55 and a margin of safety of -234%. Of the two, PLTR has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76
VS
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
$184.11

Rewards

INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
PLTR
  • ★Gross margin of 84.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 125.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.67 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
PLTR
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 14% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 2 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
PLTR
Valuation
$670.37M
Free Cash Flow
$2.16B
0.19%
FCF Yield
0.49%
N/A
Trailing P/E
158.72
35.50
Forward P/E
78.33
Quality & Moat
4.06%
ROIC
22.70%
-9.62%
ROE
38.10%
40.15%
Gross Margin
84.80%
1.36
PEG Ratio
1.67
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
-3.45
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
INTC: 2Ties: 1PLTR: 8
INTCPLTR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PLTR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PLTR
$179.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$411.56B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PLTR
233.6% Overvalued
Price is 233.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.11
Fair Value: $55.19
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

PLTR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

+44.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +40.1%

The market implies +44.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +40.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PLTR
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PLTR
-1.84
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PLTR
Insiders 3.5%Institutions 64.8%Retail & Other 31.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,837
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PLTR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Former
$1.16M
@ $116.14 · 2025-05-08
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PLTR
12
Sells (3M)
44
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $560.61M
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.17M
@ $197.99 · 2026-10-15
WOERSCHING ERIC H
Director
$205,000
@ $205.00 · 2026-10-09
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$3.62M
@ $201.15 · 2026-10-08
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$1.00M
@ $199.00 · 2026-10-08
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$253,963
@ $189.95 · 2026-10-01
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.76M
@ $172.64 · 2026-09-15
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$244,915
@ $182.50 · 2026-09-01
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$577,133
@ $174.62 · 2026-08-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$86.06M
@ $174.79 · 2026-08-20
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.79M
@ $174.28 · 2026-08-17
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$5.45M
@ $155.70 · 2026-08-06
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$500,280
@ $165.00 · 2026-08-05
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.14M
@ $134.05 · 2026-07-15
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.13M
@ $133.35 · 2026-06-15
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$190,753
@ $128.80 · 2026-06-11
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$505,730
@ $154.89 · 2026-06-01
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$346,954
@ $136.49 · 2026-05-22
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$2.67M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Executive Officer
$22.52M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$54.11M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$43.52M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.14M
@ $134.04 · 2026-05-15
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.23M
@ $139.41 · 2026-04-15
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.44M
@ $152.41 · 2026-03-16
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$520,601
@ $132.27 · 2026-02-24
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$2.67M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$22.47M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$65.96M
@ $133.78 · 2026-02-20
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$43.74M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.33M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.99M
@ $149.65 · 2026-02-02
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$60,456
@ $151.14 · 2026-02-02
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$2.18M
@ $181.35 · 2026-01-02
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.46M
@ $172.98 · 2026-01-02
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$616,590
@ $181.35 · 2026-01-02
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.67M
@ $185.91 · 2025-12-12
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.34M
@ $167.19 · 2025-12-01
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$631,898
@ $161.32 · 2025-11-24
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$9.12M
@ $162.63 · 2025-11-24
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$66.04M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$27.55M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$56.73M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.86M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$4.09M
@ $204.54 · 2025-11-03
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$149,112
@ $186.39 · 2025-10-03
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.68M
@ $184.01 · 2025-10-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$5.71M
@ $158.35 · 2025-09-05
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.13M
@ $156.42 · 2025-09-02
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$12.51M
@ $154.47 · 2025-09-02
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$440,071
@ $157.00 · 2025-08-29
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$30.99M
@ $154.29 · 2025-08-22
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$362,700
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$3.10M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$62.74M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$53.97M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.71M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$56.70M
@ $151.20 · 2025-08-20
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$5.25M
@ $175.00 · 2025-08-05
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.09M
@ $154.73 · 2025-08-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$5.00M
@ $150.00 · 2025-07-15
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$111,688
@ $139.61 · 2025-07-09
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.51M
@ $135.31 · 2025-07-01
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.62M
@ $131.06 · 2025-07-01
WOERSCHING ERIC H
Director
$1.34M
@ $130.95 · 2025-07-01
SANKAR SHYAM
Officer
$53.49M
@ $132.08 · 2025-06-10
WOERSCHING ERIC H
Director
$2.20M
@ $129.29 · 2025-06-09
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.51M
@ $125.38 · 2025-06-06
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$239,689
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.98M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$50.39M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Officer
$21.17M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$43.47M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.32M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.37M
@ $118.58 · 2025-05-01
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$65,000
@ $81.25 · 2025-04-03
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.68M
@ $83.83 · 2025-04-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$8.13M
@ $82.80 · 2025-03-31
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$26.99M
@ $87.07 · 2025-03-17
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$310.25M
@ $82.73 · 2025-03-14
SCHIFF ALEXANDRA W
Director
$587,010
@ $86.63 · 2025-03-05
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.74M
@ $87.19 · 2025-03-03
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$21.42M
@ $101.50 · 2025-02-24
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$44.56M
@ $103.01 · 2025-02-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$69.27M
@ $102.62 · 2025-02-21
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Officer
$2.31M
@ $103.01 · 2025-02-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$38.43M
@ $102.47 · 2025-02-20
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Officer
$1.61M
@ $115.96 · 2025-02-11
SCHIFF ALEXANDRA W
Director
$415,318
@ $103.83 · 2025-02-04
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.63M
@ $81.46 · 2025-02-03
SCHIFF ALEXANDRA W
Director
$286,540
@ $71.64 · 2025-01-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PLTR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
PLTR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View INTC Full AnalysisView PLTR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs PLTR

Is Intel Corporation or Palantir Technologies Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PLTR trades at a -233.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $55 vs. price $184), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Palantir Technologies Inc.?▼

PLTR scores 38/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PLTR scores 182.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Palantir Technologies Inc.?▼

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) generates a 0.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Palantir Technologies Inc.?▼

PLTR earns 22.7% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs PLTR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io