Compare StocksINTC vs PHM

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
$117.85

Rewards

INTC
    PHM
    • PulteGroup, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • PulteGroup, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 46.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PHM
    • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Trailing P/E of 10.6x is 38% above the historical average of 7.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $25.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PHM
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.50B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    6.62%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    10.59
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    10.43
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    16.01%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    17.09%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    26.87%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.18
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.13
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.88%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1PHM: 7
    INTCPHM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PHM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PHM
    $1.66
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $7.42B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$12.32B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PHM
    60.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 60.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $117.85
    Fair Value: $294.80
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PHM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $118?

    -1.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.1%

    The market implies -1.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PHM
    78/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PHM
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PHM
    Insiders 0.9%Institutions 95.2%Retail & Other 3.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,426
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PHM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PHM
    6
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $28.03M
    HENRY KEVIN A
    Officer
    $729,574
    @ $141.03 · 2026-02-24
    O'MEARA BRIEN P.
    Officer
    $542,040
    @ $135.51 · 2026-02-06
    KOART MATTHEW WILLIAM
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.08M
    @ $135.79 · 2026-02-06
    SHELDON TODD N
    General Counsel
    $1.92M
    @ $135.01 · 2026-02-06
    MARSHALL RYAN R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.89M
    @ $133.86 · 2026-02-05
    FOLLIARD THOMAS J
    Director
    $4.96M
    @ $134.04 · 2026-02-05
    O'MEARA BRIEN P.
    Officer
    $104,170
    @ $127.97 · 2025-08-14
    O SHAUGHNESSY ROBERT T
    Officer
    $2.81M
    @ $128.03 · 2025-08-14
    O'MEARA BRIEN P.
    Officer
    $372,386
    @ $106.40 · 2025-02-13
    SHELDON TODD N
    General Counsel
    $1.62M
    @ $106.50 · 2025-02-13
    ANDERSON BRIAN P
    Director
    $266,122
    @ $106.45 · 2025-02-10
    FOLLIARD THOMAS J
    Director
    $2.49M
    @ $131.14 · 2024-08-28
    O SHAUGHNESSY ROBERT T
    Chief Financial Officer
    $9.57M
    @ $134.83 · 2024-08-23
    SNYDER LILA
    Director
    $190,034
    @ $124.37 · 2024-08-20
    O SHAUGHNESSY ROBERT T
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.75M
    @ $129.29 · 2024-08-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PHM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    PHM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PHM Full Analysis