Compare StocksINTC vs PH

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$900.01

Rewards

INTC
    PH
    • Parker-Hannifin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PH
    • FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • 13 insider sales totaling $24.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PH
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $3.34B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    2.94%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    32.79
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    26.47
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    14.52%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    24.66%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    37.43%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.69
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.76
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.80%
    INTC: 2Ties: 2PH: 5
    INTCPH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PH
    $12.10
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.11B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$73.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PH
    48.5% Overvalued
    Price is 48.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $900.01
    Fair Value: $606.25
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $900?

    +15.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +16.0%

    The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PH
    84/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PH
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PH
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.4%Retail & Other 9.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,375
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PH
    13
    Sells (3M)
    30
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $46.71M
    BENDALI RACHID
    Officer
    $414,777
    @ $1006.74 · 2026-02-13
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $1002.13 · 2026-02-13
    SCOTT PATRICK M.
    Officer
    $818,889
    @ $983.06 · 2026-02-12
    HART MARK J
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $1009.12 · 2026-02-12
    GENTILE THOMAS C.
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $1001.51 · 2026-02-12
    LEOMBRUNO TODD M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.07M
    @ $1002.34 · 2026-02-11
    PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.69M
    @ $996.66 · 2026-02-11
    ROSS ANDREW D.
    President
    $4.66M
    @ $999.00 · 2026-02-11
    JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
    Officer
    $535,766
    @ $949.94 · 2026-02-02
    PAREL DINU JOHN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $950.05 · 2026-02-02
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $946.48 · 2026-02-02
    IVES ANGELA R
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $952.30 · 2026-01-30
    GENTILE THOMAS C.
    Officer
    $2.24M
    @ $941.31 · 2026-01-30
    ROSS ANDREW D.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.23M
    @ $894.81 · 2025-12-11
    BENDALI RACHID
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $852.99 · 2025-11-12
    REIDY JAY
    Officer
    $337,675
    @ $863.62 · 2025-11-12
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $3.03M
    @ $864.58 · 2025-11-12
    VERRIER JAMES R.
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $750.00 · 2025-09-02
    LEONTI JOSEPH R.
    General Counsel
    $3.47M
    @ $750.84 · 2025-08-25
    PAREL DINU JOHN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $817,477
    @ $741.14 · 2025-08-12
    SCOTT PATRICK M.
    Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $729.45 · 2025-08-08
    JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
    Officer
    $421,510
    @ $733.06 · 2025-08-08
    IVES ANGELA R
    Officer
    $589,162
    @ $727.36 · 2025-08-08
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $202,506
    @ $728.44 · 2025-08-08
    ROSS ANDREW D.
    President
    $3.20M
    @ $732.66 · 2025-08-08
    MALONE ROBERT W
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $730.66 · 2025-08-08
    HART MARK J
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $730.22 · 2025-08-08
    GENTILE THOMAS C.
    Officer
    $826,524
    @ $729.50 · 2025-08-08
    REIDY JAY
    Officer
    $335,783
    @ $675.62 · 2025-05-19
    REIDY JAY
    Officer
    $93,056
    @ $620.37 · 2025-05-02
    CZAJA MARK T.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $266,948
    @ $711.86 · 2025-01-31
    PAREL DINU JOHN
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $699.39 · 2024-11-06
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $1.08M
    @ $699.29 · 2024-11-06
    PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.46M
    @ $704.69 · 2024-11-06
    MALONE ROBERT W
    Officer
    $2.76M
    @ $700.24 · 2024-11-06
    HART MARK J
    Officer
    $2.79M
    @ $705.40 · 2024-11-06
    GENTILE THOMAS C.
    Officer
    $1.70M
    @ $701.16 · 2024-11-06
    ROSS ANDREW D.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.43M
    @ $706.04 · 2024-11-06
    VERRIER JAMES R.
    Director
    $825,981
    @ $635.37 · 2024-11-04
    IVES ANGELA R
    Officer
    $118,773
    @ $635.15 · 2024-11-01
    LEONTI JOSEPH R.
    General Counsel
    $3.71M
    @ $631.04 · 2024-11-01
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $503,982
    @ $592.92 · 2024-08-26
    PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $588.59 · 2024-08-22
    ROSS ANDREW D.
    President
    $1.90M
    @ $588.58 · 2024-08-16
    BENDALI RACHID
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $574.86 · 2024-08-14
    PAREL DINU JOHN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $807,685
    @ $571.61 · 2024-08-09
    HART MARK J
    Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $566.23 · 2024-08-09
    GENTILE THOMAS C.
    Officer
    $583,536
    @ $567.09 · 2024-08-09
    BRACHT BEREND
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $543.85 · 2024-05-06
    REIDY JAY
    Officer
    $306,872
    @ $536.49 · 2024-05-03
    IVES ANGELA R
    Officer
    $505,760
    @ $545.00 · 2024-05-03
    MALONE ROBERT W
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $544.25 · 2024-05-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(51/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    PH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PH Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io