Compare StocksINTC vs PEG

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (PEG)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
PEG
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
$82.78

Rewards

INTC
    PEG
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.35 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    PEG
    • Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated scores only 19/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    PEG
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-105.00M
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    -0.25%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    19.62
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    17.57
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    4.22%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    12.43%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    34.82%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.87
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.43
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.35
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.24%
    INTC: 2Ties: 2PEG: 5
    INTCPEG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PEG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PEG
    $3.35
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.85B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$9.55B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PEG
    89.7% Overvalued
    Price is 89.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $82.78
    Fair Value: $43.63
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PEG

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    PEG
    19/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PEG
    -2.42
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PEG
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 77.5%Retail & Other 22.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,683
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PEG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PEG
    2
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.42M
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $174,256
    @ $83.66 · 2026-03-05
    THIGPEN RICHARD T.
    Officer
    $390,100
    @ $83.00 · 2026-03-03
    THIGPEN RICHARD T.
    Officer
    $405,088
    @ $82.33 · 2025-11-07
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $115,288
    @ $83.12 · 2025-07-01
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $112,826
    @ $81.88 · 2025-06-02
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $109,219
    @ $79.26 · 2025-05-01
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $114,213
    @ $82.88 · 2025-04-01
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $112,518
    @ $81.65 · 2025-03-03
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $114,509
    @ $83.10 · 2025-02-03
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $117,009
    @ $84.91 · 2025-01-02
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $128,094
    @ $92.96 · 2024-12-02
    THIGPEN RICHARD T.
    Officer
    $518,883
    @ $87.95 · 2024-11-11
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $121,917
    @ $88.47 · 2024-11-01
    LINDE TAMARA LOUISE
    Officer
    $866,594
    @ $90.61 · 2024-10-09
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,300
    @ $90.20 · 2024-10-01
    LINDE TAMARA LOUISE
    General Counsel
    $760,641
    @ $79.54 · 2024-09-09
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $111,192
    @ $80.69 · 2024-09-03
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $111,819
    @ $81.15 · 2024-08-26
    LINDE TAMARA LOUISE
    General Counsel
    $1.54M
    @ $80.26 · 2024-08-15
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $102,959
    @ $74.99 · 2024-06-03
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $95,566
    @ $69.55 · 2024-05-01
    CHERNICK ROSE M
    Officer
    $13,156
    @ $65.78 · 2024-04-22
    LAROSSA RALPH A JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $91,192
    @ $66.37 · 2024-04-01
    CHERNICK ROSE M
    Officer
    $12,840
    @ $64.20 · 2024-03-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PEG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    PEG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView PEG Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (PEG) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io