Compare StocksINTC vs NTRS

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
$164.48

Rewards

INTC
    NTRS
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.52 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    NTRS
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.27 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    NTRS
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    17.21
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    13.95
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    12.04%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    0.40
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.95%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1NTRS: 3
    INTCNTRS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    NTRS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NTRS
    $2.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.93B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$7.01B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NTRS
    14.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 14.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $164.48
    Fair Value: $192.26
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    NTRS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    NTRS
    54/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NTRS
    -2.60
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NTRS
    Insiders 0.9%Institutions 86.5%Retail & Other 12.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,251
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NTRS
    1
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $752,920
    PETRINO RICHARD
    Director
    $148,910
    @ $148.91 · 2026-02-05
    MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
    Director
    $37,203
    @ $151.85 · 2026-02-02
    MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $128.57 · 2025-11-04
    MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
    Director
    $34,198
    @ $126.66 · 2025-10-27
    MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
    Director
    $32,343
    @ $126.34 · 2025-08-13
    MORITZ ROBERT EDWARD JR.
    Director
    $10,261
    @ $91.62 · 2025-04-24
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NTRS
    4
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.20M
    BELLOWS CLIVE
    Officer
    $462,056
    @ $165.02 · 2026-04-24
    FOX DAVID W JR
    Chief Financial Officer
    $468,362
    @ $143.89 · 2026-03-04
    FOX DAVID W JR
    Chief Financial Officer
    $208,872
    @ $144.05 · 2026-02-25
    BELLOWS CLIVE
    Officer
    $166,758
    @ $145.26 · 2026-02-12
    SOUTH THOMAS A
    Officer
    $695,150
    @ $139.03 · 2025-12-11
    LANDERS JOHN P.
    Officer
    $95,252
    @ $124.35 · 2025-11-17
    LEVY SUSAN COHEN
    General Counsel
    $3.54M
    @ $128.13 · 2025-11-04
    PARKER TERESA A
    Officer
    $997,458
    @ $131.21 · 2025-07-31
    HALLINAN AENGUS
    Officer
    $528.00
    @ $105.60 · 2025-05-22
    CONWAY KELLEY
    Officer
    $52,640
    @ $105.28 · 2025-05-12
    FOX DAVID W JR
    Chief Financial Officer
    $535,772
    @ $105.55 · 2025-05-12
    PARKER TERESA A
    Officer
    $650,710
    @ $100.62 · 2025-05-09
    BELLOWS CLIVE
    Officer
    $329,835
    @ $99.95 · 2025-05-08
    SOUTH THOMAS A
    Officer
    $429,852
    @ $113.00 · 2025-02-19
    LANDERS JOHN P.
    Officer
    $100,296
    @ $111.44 · 2025-02-04
    KARPINSKI JANE B.
    Officer
    $251,828
    @ $111.33 · 2025-02-03
    TYLER JASON J
    Officer
    $252,043
    @ $112.67 · 2025-01-30
    CHERECWICH PETER B
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $112.36 · 2025-01-29
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NTRS
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(66/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    NTRS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView NTRS Full Analysis
    INTC vs NTRS: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io