Compare StocksINTC vs NRG

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$161.40

Rewards

INTC
    NRG
    • Share count has been reduced by 17% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $39.00 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    NRG
    • ROIC has declined by 6.1 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 19.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 40.4x is 93% above the historical average of 20.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    NRG
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.09B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    3.18%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    40.35
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    14.03
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    5.64%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    47.41%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    19.38%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    9.89
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.02
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.18%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1NRG: 5
    INTCNRG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    NRG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NRG
    $39.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $590.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$23.01B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NRG
    3.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 3.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $161.40
    Fair Value: $166.36
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    NRG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $161?

    +21.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +17.9%

    The market implies +21.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    NRG
    42/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NRG
    -2.54
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NRG
    Insiders 4.5%Institutions 86.2%Retail & Other 9.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NRG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NRG
    4
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.85M
    KINNEY VIRGINIA
    Officer
    $783,250
    @ $156.65 · 2026-03-16
    CHUNG BRUCE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.94M
    @ $156.56 · 2026-01-07
    CURCI BRIAN
    General Counsel
    $17.26M
    @ $160.46 · 2026-01-06
    CHUNG BRUCE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $158.79 · 2026-01-06
    KINNEY VIRGINIA
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $163.82 · 2025-11-14
    LIYANEARACHCHI DAK
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $155.00 · 2025-09-10
    HOWELL KEVIN T
    Director
    $7.72M
    @ $154.50 · 2025-05-30
    CHUNG BRUCE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $97.63 · 2025-01-13
    GAUDETTE ROBERT J
    Officer
    $5.48M
    @ $91.41 · 2025-01-02
    DONOHUE ELISABETH B
    Director
    $99,154
    @ $91.64 · 2024-11-14
    PATEL RASESH M.
    Officer
    $8.24M
    @ $80.35 · 2024-09-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NRG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    NRG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView NRG Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io