Compare StocksINTC vs NEM

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Newmont Corporation (NEM)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$108.62

Rewards

INTC
    NEM
    • Gross margin of 67.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 88.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.54 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    NEM
    • Share count has increased by 37% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $2.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    NEM
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $9.80B
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    8.46%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    14.09
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    9.58
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    29.80%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    20.19%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    67.36%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    0.18
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.16
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.20
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.96%
    INTC: 0Ties: 1NEM: 9
    INTCNEM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    NEM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NEM
    $16.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $4.27B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$71.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NEM
    34.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 34.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $108.62
    Fair Value: $166.44
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    NEM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $109?

    +4.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.1%

    The market implies +4.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    NEM
    31/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NEM
    -2.68
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NEM
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 82.3%Retail & Other 17.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,469
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NEM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    CONGER HARRY M IV
    Director
    $400,335
    @ $42.15 · 2024-11-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NEM
    6
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.79M
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $339,270
    @ $113.09 · 2026-04-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $324,000
    @ $108.00 · 2026-03-18
    RODGERS MARK C
    Officer
    $164,382
    @ $120.78 · 2026-03-03
    RODGERS MARK C
    Officer
    $268,968
    @ $131.14 · 2026-03-02
    RODGERS MARK C
    Officer
    $577,590
    @ $130.00 · 2026-02-27
    RODGERS MARK C
    Officer
    $643,375
    @ $125.00 · 2026-02-25
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $192,109
    @ $92.36 · 2025-12-01
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $406,700
    @ $81.34 · 2025-11-03
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $168,397
    @ $80.96 · 2025-11-03
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $176,779
    @ $84.99 · 2025-10-01
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $154,923
    @ $74.59 · 2025-09-02
    TABOLT BRIAN
    Officer
    $477,160
    @ $68.02 · 2025-08-06
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $190,980
    @ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $132,222
    @ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $176,250
    @ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $122,024
    @ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $162,270
    @ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $112,345
    @ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $154,440
    @ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $106,924
    @ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $145,380
    @ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $100,651
    @ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $131,130
    @ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
    VILJOEN NATASCHA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $340,894
    @ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $90,786
    @ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $128,670
    @ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
    VILJOEN NATASCHA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $386,010
    @ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $89,083
    @ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $120,000
    @ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
    VILJOEN NATASCHA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $360,000
    @ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
    BROOK BRUCE R
    Director
    $83,080
    @ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $124,770
    @ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
    VILJOEN NATASCHA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $374,310
    @ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $540,670
    @ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $136,350
    @ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,850
    @ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $161,430
    @ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.08M
    @ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
    TOTH PETER
    Officer
    $157,410
    @ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
    CAGE JOSHUA
    Officer
    $49,150
    @ $49.15 · 2024-08-14
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $990,250
    @ $49.51 · 2024-08-01
    PALMER THOMAS RONALD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,690
    @ $42.13 · 2024-07-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NEM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    NEM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView NEM Full Analysis