Compare StocksINTC vs NEE

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
$92.41

Rewards

INTC
    NEE
    • Gross margin of 62.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    NEE
    • NextEra Energy, Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.13 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    NEE
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-15.21B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    -7.90%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    28.00
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    21.10
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    3.23%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    10.28%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    62.27%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.46
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    6.68
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.70%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1NEE: 4
    INTCNEE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    NEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NEE
    $0.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $8.39B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.11B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NEE
    200.2% Overvalued
    Price is 200.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $92.41
    Fair Value: $30.78
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    NEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    NEE
    24/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NEE
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NEE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 15.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,718
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NEE
    9
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $36.59M
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $458,862
    @ $93.00 · 2026-03-13
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $646,423
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $347,088
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    CREWS TERRELL KIRK II
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $482,505
    @ $95.00 · 2026-02-17
    KETCHUM JOHN W.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.90M
    @ $89.34 · 2026-02-09
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $920,210
    @ $85.00 · 2026-01-22
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $985,481
    @ $81.25 · 2025-12-11
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Director
    $12.18M
    @ $83.91 · 2025-11-17
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $906,880
    @ $80.00 · 2025-10-03
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $62,943
    @ $77.90 · 2025-10-01
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $63,365
    @ $74.90 · 2025-09-25
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $60,827
    @ $71.90 · 2025-09-12
    DUNNE MICHAEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $707,900
    @ $70.79 · 2025-09-08
    COFFEY ROBERT
    Officer
    $538,800
    @ $71.84 · 2025-07-28
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $168,718
    @ $77.50 · 2025-07-22
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $75.00 · 2025-05-16
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer
    $162,258
    @ $68.09 · 2025-02-18
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $302,809
    @ $75.57 · 2024-11-12
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $85.00 · 2024-09-16
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $7.95M
    @ $80.00 · 2024-08-26
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $4.06M
    @ $78.55 · 2024-05-31
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NEE
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    NEE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView NEE Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io