Compare StocksINTC vs NEE

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. NEE is overvalued at $87, with an intrinsic value of $27 and a margin of safety of -224%. Of the two, NEE has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
$86.75

Rewards

INTC
    NEE
    • Gross margin of 61.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    NEE
    • NextEra Energy, Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • High leverage (1.54x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    NEE
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-18.45B
    -1.23%
    FCF Yield
    -10.20%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    22.02
    86.70
    Forward P/E
    19.71
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    3.88%
    -2.91%
    ROE
    10.32%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    61.40%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.90
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.10
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.54
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    7.23
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    2.89%
    INTC: 5Ties: 1NEE: 5
    INTCNEE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    NEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NEE
    $0.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $8.39B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.11B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NEE
    224.0% Overvalued
    Price is 224.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $86.75
    Fair Value: $26.77
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    NEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    NEE
    24/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NEE
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NEE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.0%Retail & Other 12.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,865
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NEE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.58M
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $458,862
    @ $93.00 · 2026-03-13
    CREWS TERRELL KIRK II
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $646,423
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $347,088
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $482,505
    @ $95.00 · 2026-02-17
    KETCHUM JOHN W.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.90M
    @ $89.34 · 2026-02-09
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $920,210
    @ $85.00 · 2026-01-22
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $985,481
    @ $81.25 · 2025-12-11
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Director
    $12.18M
    @ $83.91 · 2025-11-17
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $906,880
    @ $80.00 · 2025-10-03
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $62,943
    @ $77.90 · 2025-10-01
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $63,365
    @ $74.90 · 2025-09-25
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $60,827
    @ $71.90 · 2025-09-12
    DUNNE MICHAEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $707,900
    @ $70.79 · 2025-09-08
    COFFEY ROBERT
    Officer
    $538,800
    @ $71.84 · 2025-07-28
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $168,718
    @ $77.50 · 2025-07-22
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $75.00 · 2025-05-16
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer
    $162,258
    @ $68.09 · 2025-02-18
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $302,809
    @ $75.57 · 2024-11-12
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $85.00 · 2024-09-16
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $7.95M
    @ $80.00 · 2024-08-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NEE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    NEE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView NEE Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs NEE

    Is Intel Corporation or NextEra Energy, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, NEE trades at a -224.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $27 vs. price $87), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or NextEra Energy, Inc.?

    NEE scores 24/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is NextEra Energy, Inc. in financial distress?

    NEE's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or NextEra Energy, Inc.?

    Intel Corporation (INTC) generates a -1.2% free cash flow yield, compared to NextEra Energy, Inc.'s -10.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or NextEra Energy, Inc.?

    NEE earns 3.9% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.