Compare StocksINTC vs MTD

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Mettler-Toledo International, I (MTD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, INTC is overvalued at $90, with a DCF intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. MTD is undervalued at $1416, with an intrinsic value of $18601283319 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, MTD has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20
VS
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International, I
$1416.30

Rewards

INTC
    MTD
    • Mettler-Toledo International, I has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 60.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Mettler-Toledo International, I scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    MTD
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.07 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • PEG ratio of 2.97 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (162.68x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MTD
    Valuation
    $4.87B
    Free Cash Flow
    $693.59M
    1.07%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    31.95
    44.27
    Forward P/E
    27.51
    Quality & Moat
    3.57%
    ROIC
    47.39%
    -10.71%
    ROE
    6778.39%
    38.87%
    Gross Margin
    60.26%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.97
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Net Debt / Equity
    162.68
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.24
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.64
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1MTD: 5
    INTCMTD

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MTD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MTD
    $-0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.52B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-51.26
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MTD
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $1416.30
    Fair Value: $18601283319.04
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    MTD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1416?

    -25.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -20.7%

    The market implies -25.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -20.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MTD
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MTD
    -2.43
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MTD
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 103.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,229
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MTD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MTD
    0
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $32.18M
    VADALA SHAWN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $1410.12 · 2026-02-10
    VADALA SHAWN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $1481.14 · 2025-11-25
    GUERONNIERE MARC DE LA
    Officer
    $9.01M
    @ $1488.18 · 2025-11-25
    KELLER GERRY
    Officer
    $334,785
    @ $1418.58 · 2025-11-21
    KALTENBACH PATRICK
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.92M
    @ $1462.50 · 2025-11-12
    VADALA SHAWN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.76M
    @ $1455.52 · 2025-11-11
    GUERONNIERE MARC DE LA
    Officer
    $9.98M
    @ $1450.00 · 2025-11-11
    FINNEY ELISHA W
    Director
    $679,512
    @ $1433.57 · 2025-11-10
    VADALA SHAWN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $397,500
    @ $1325.00 · 2025-08-19
    KELLER GERRY
    Officer
    $215,926
    @ $1308.64 · 2025-08-14
    SALICE THOMAS P
    Director
    $1.38M
    @ $1300.90 · 2025-08-13
    VADALA SHAWN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $376,227
    @ $1254.09 · 2025-08-08
    KELLY MICHAEL A
    Director
    $1.23M
    @ $1159.93 · 2025-05-28
    MAGLOTH CHRISTIAN
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $1313.69 · 2025-02-24
    GUERONNIERE MARC DE LA
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $1331.89 · 2025-02-11
    KELLER GERRY
    Officer
    $810,806
    @ $1351.34 · 2025-02-10
    KELLER GERRY
    Officer
    $175,573
    @ $1254.09 · 2024-12-03
    FINNEY ELISHA W
    Director
    $99,693
    @ $1311.75 · 2024-11-11
    MAGLOTH CHRISTIAN
    Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $1422.97 · 2024-08-15
    VADALA SHAWN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $350,250
    @ $1401.00 · 2024-08-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MTD
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    MTD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MTD Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs MTD

    Is Intel Corporation or Mettler-Toledo International, I more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MTD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $18601283319 vs. price $1416), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Mettler-Toledo International, I?

    MTD scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MTD scores 5.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Mettler-Toledo International, I?

    MTD earns 47.4% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    INTC vs MTD: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io