Compare StocksINTC vs MTB

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
$196.24

Rewards

INTC
    MTB
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.18 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
    • PEG ratio of 0.55 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    MTB
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $7.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MTB
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    11.55
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    9.31
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    21.21%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.55
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.06%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1MTB: 2
    INTCMTB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    MTB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MTB
    $1.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $5.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.03B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MTB
    65.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $196.24
    Fair Value: $572.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MTB

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MTB
    32/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MTB
    -2.42
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MTB
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 92.9%Retail & Other 6.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,435
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MTB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MTB
    6
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.17M
    WISLER MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $1.84M
    @ $223.51 · 2026-02-26
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $246,623
    @ $234.21 · 2026-02-11
    BARNES JOHN P
    Director
    $5.00M
    @ $235.85 · 2026-02-09
    WALTERS KIRK W
    Director
    $206,676
    @ $227.37 · 2026-02-03
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $158,638
    @ $225.34 · 2026-02-02
    GEISEL GARY N
    Director
    $191,369
    @ $215.99 · 2026-01-28
    KAY CHRISTOPHER E
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $191.70 · 2025-11-26
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $693,061
    @ $202.12 · 2025-08-29
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $89,502
    @ $199.78 · 2025-08-26
    D'ARCY PETER
    Officer
    $485,570
    @ $197.31 · 2025-07-22
    LEDGETT RICHARD H. JR.
    Director
    $252,178
    @ $197.48 · 2025-07-21
    KAY CHRISTOPHER E
    Officer
    $299,527
    @ $172.34 · 2025-03-12
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $468,200
    @ $220.74 · 2024-11-26
    SALAMONE DENIS J
    Director
    $2.23M
    @ $223.41 · 2024-11-25
    WISLER MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $213.05 · 2024-11-14
    TODARO MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $214.10 · 2024-11-12
    PEARSON KEVIN J
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $195.88 · 2024-11-01
    O HARA LAURA PROSKE
    Officer
    $956,118
    @ $196.93 · 2024-10-28
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $280,057
    @ $195.03 · 2024-10-28
    JONES RENE F.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.47M
    @ $193.88 · 2024-10-28
    SALAMONE DENIS J
    Director
    $1.72M
    @ $172.03 · 2024-09-03
    TODARO MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $778,897
    @ $162.58 · 2024-08-09
    PEARSON KEVIN J
    Officer
    $989,066
    @ $162.27 · 2024-08-09
    GEISEL GARY N
    Director
    $86,249
    @ $172.50 · 2024-07-24
    BARNES JOHN P
    Director
    $6.71M
    @ $154.50 · 2024-05-14
    KAY CHRISTOPHER E
    Officer
    $280,034
    @ $153.78 · 2024-05-10
    BARNES JOHN P
    Director
    $9.71M
    @ $148.16 · 2024-05-06
    WALTERS KIRK W
    Director
    $2.39M
    @ $148.01 · 2024-05-06
    MEISTER DORIS P
    Officer
    $495,125
    @ $147.27 · 2024-05-03
    BARNES JOHN P
    Director
    $2.95M
    @ $147.56 · 2024-04-26
    MEISTER DORIS P
    Officer
    $226,388
    @ $138.21 · 2024-04-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MTB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(42/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    MTB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MTB Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io