Compare StocksINTC vs MRK

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTC is overvalued at $101, with a DCF intrinsic value of $6 and a margin of safety of -1509%. MRK is undervalued at $145, with an intrinsic value of $596 and a margin of safety of 76%. Of the two, MRK has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$101.05
VS
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$144.91

Rewards

INTC
    MRK
    • Gross margin of 75.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    MRK
    • PEG ratio of 2.63 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 7 insider sales totaling $30.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MRK
    Valuation
    $4.87B
    Free Cash Flow
    $15.17B
    0.91%
    FCF Yield
    4.24%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    115.01
    49.42
    Forward P/E
    15.17
    Quality & Moat
    3.57%
    ROIC
    -0.13%
    -10.71%
    ROE
    6.96%
    38.87%
    Gross Margin
    75.90%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.63
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.11
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.24
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.62
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    2.36%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1MRK: 6
    INTCMRK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MRK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MRK
    $-1.72
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $12.28B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-21.09B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $101.05
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MRK
    75.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 75.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $144.91
    Fair Value: $596.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

    +31.8%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    MRK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $145?

    +7.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +11.6%

    The market implies +7.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MRK
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MRK
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.0%Institutions 62.5%Retail & Other 23.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,436
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MRK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.1%Retail & Other 16.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,839
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.25M
    TAN LIP-BU
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.00M
    @ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MRK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    THULIN INGE G
    Director
    $250,000
    @ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
    BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
    Director
    $1.33M
    @ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MRK
    7
    Sells (3M)
    21
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $72.01M
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $135.00 · 2026-08-13
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $10.72M
    @ $133.46 · 2026-08-12
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $5.94M
    @ $131.12 · 2026-08-12
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $131.00 · 2026-08-06
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $788,773
    @ $130.38 · 2026-08-06
    MARALDO DAVID R.
    Officer
    $2.41M
    @ $128.72 · 2026-08-05
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $6.81M
    @ $128.77 · 2026-08-05
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $14.49M
    @ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $609,525
    @ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $4.56M
    @ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $765,920
    @ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
    LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
    DAVIS ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.60M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $616,395
    @ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $720,040
    @ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $352,723
    @ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $714,745
    @ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $512,057
    @ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $209,551
    @ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MRK
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    MRK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MRK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs MRK

    Is Intel Corporation or Merck & Co., Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MRK trades at a 75.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $596 vs. price $145), compared to INTC's -1509.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $6 vs. $101).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Merck & Co., Inc.?

    MRK scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MRK scores 3.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Merck & Co., Inc.?

    Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) generates a 4.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Merck & Co., Inc.?

    INTC earns 3.6% ROIC versus MRK's -0.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.