Compare StocksINTC vs MRK

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$96.77
VS
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$113.52

Rewards

INTC
    MRK
    • Gross margin of 76.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.38 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • Dividend yield of 3.03% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    MRK
    • PEG ratio of 3.43 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 12 insider sales totaling $40.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MRK
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -1.71%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    31.89
    64.88
    Forward P/E
    11.66
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    19.18%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    34.66%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    76.60%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    3.43
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.96
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.23
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.03%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1MRK: 4
    INTCMRK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    MRK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MRK
    $-1.72
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $12.28B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-21.09B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $96.77
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MRK
    78.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 78.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $113.52
    Fair Value: $522.77
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MRK

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MRK
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MRK
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MRK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 81.3%Retail & Other 18.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,628
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MRK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    THULIN INGE G
    Director
    $250,000
    @ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
    BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
    Director
    $1.33M
    @ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MRK
    12
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.04M
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $14.49M
    @ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $4.56M
    @ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $609,525
    @ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
    DAVIS ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.60M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
    LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $765,920
    @ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $616,395
    @ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $720,040
    @ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $352,723
    @ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $714,745
    @ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $512,057
    @ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $209,551
    @ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MRK
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    MRK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MRK Full Analysis
    INTC vs MRK: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io