Compare StocksINTC vs MPWR

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTC is overvalued at $101, with a DCF intrinsic value of $6 and a margin of safety of -1509%. MPWR is overvalued at $1148, with an intrinsic value of $727 and a margin of safety of -58%. Of the two, MPWR has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$101.05
VS
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
$1147.61

Rewards

INTC
    MPWR
    • Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 52.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    MPWR
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 3 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 1.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MPWR
    Valuation
    $4.87B
    Free Cash Flow
    $663.26M
    0.91%
    FCF Yield
    1.18%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    69.93
    49.00
    Forward P/E
    32.91
    Quality & Moat
    3.57%
    ROIC
    20.47%
    -10.71%
    ROE
    21.98%
    38.87%
    Gross Margin
    55.20%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    0.86
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.24
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -1.39
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.70%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1MPWR: 9
    INTCMPWR

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MPWR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MPWR
    $14.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.93B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$27.49B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $101.05
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MPWR
    35.2% Overvalued
    Price is 35.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $1147.61
    Fair Value: $848.72
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

    +31.8%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    MPWR

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1148?

    +28.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +27.3%

    The market implies +28.2% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +27.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MPWR
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MPWR
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.0%Institutions 62.5%Retail & Other 23.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,436
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MPWR
    Insiders 3.6%Institutions 100.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,771
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.25M
    TAN LIP-BU
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.00M
    @ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MPWR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MPWR
    6
    Sells (3M)
    49
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $662.62M
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $64,078
    @ $1281.56 · 2026-08-24
    DEAN ROBERT W II
    Chief Financial Officer
    $41,527
    @ $1297.72 · 2026-08-24
    DEAN ROBERT W II
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8,482
    @ $1413.67 · 2026-08-17
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $71,000
    @ $1420.00 · 2026-08-11
    DEAN ROBERT W II
    Chief Financial Officer
    $141,148
    @ $1344.27 · 2026-08-05
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $20.25M
    @ $1349.73 · 2026-07-15
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $12.86M
    @ $1700.00 · 2026-05-27
    DEAN ROBERT W II
    Chief Financial Officer
    $36,290
    @ $1649.55 · 2026-05-26
    ZHOU JEFFREY
    Director
    $816,480
    @ $1680.00 · 2026-05-26
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $7.93M
    @ $1586.43 · 2026-05-22
    DEAN ROBERT W II
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6,253
    @ $1563.25 · 2026-05-18
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $18.74M
    @ $1561.40 · 2026-05-15
    ELMIGER EUGEN J
    Director
    $19.02M
    @ $1584.96 · 2026-05-06
    WYNNE EILEEN
    Director
    $530,198
    @ $1582.68 · 2026-05-06
    ZHOU JEFFREY
    Director
    $2.43M
    @ $1607.85 · 2026-05-06
    XIAO DEMING
    Officer
    $49.64M
    @ $1654.55 · 2026-05-06
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $11.70M
    @ $1305.22 · 2026-04-08
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $8.92M
    @ $1167.95 · 2026-04-06
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $1.59M
    @ $1133.52 · 2026-04-01
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $25.94M
    @ $1010.50 · 2026-03-30
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.67M
    @ $1171.83 · 2026-02-12
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.23M
    @ $1188.92 · 2026-02-11
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.84M
    @ $1142.28 · 2026-02-10
    LEE VICTOR K
    Director
    $484,864
    @ $1212.16 · 2026-02-09
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $64.32M
    @ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $25.44M
    @ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $26.79M
    @ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
    XIAO DEMING
    Officer
    $26.79M
    @ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $26.79M
    @ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.39M
    @ $1129.76 · 2026-02-02
    LEE VICTOR K
    Director
    $558,516
    @ $930.86 · 2026-01-02
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.82M
    @ $940.47 · 2026-01-02
    LEE VICTOR K
    Director
    $951,719
    @ $951.72 · 2025-12-24
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.72M
    @ $908.21 · 2025-12-01
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $18.53M
    @ $926.47 · 2025-11-26
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $89,697
    @ $896.97 · 2025-11-25
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $18.08M
    @ $904.18 · 2025-11-25
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $3.56M
    @ $895.23 · 2025-11-24
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $87,397
    @ $873.97 · 2025-11-21
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $6.12M
    @ $870.21 · 2025-11-19
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $24.66M
    @ $881.66 · 2025-11-19
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $35.72M
    @ $965.52 · 2025-11-12
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.34M
    @ $958.39 · 2025-11-11
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.07M
    @ $1024.43 · 2025-11-03
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $1.41M
    @ $1087.62 · 2025-10-24
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $17.14M
    @ $1017.77 · 2025-10-16
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $913.22 · 2025-10-01
    MARTINEZ CARINTIA
    Director
    $1.26M
    @ $900.00 · 2025-09-18
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $13.27M
    @ $914.45 · 2025-09-18
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $814.34 · 2025-09-02
    ELMIGER EUGEN J
    Director
    $3.39M
    @ $846.71 · 2025-08-29
    ZHOU JEFFREY
    Director
    $167,910
    @ $870.00 · 2025-08-27
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.77M
    @ $829.10 · 2025-08-15
    ZHOU JEFFREY
    Director
    $340,000
    @ $850.00 · 2025-08-13
    ZHOU JEFFREY
    Director
    $166,000
    @ $830.00 · 2025-08-12
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $750.00 · 2025-08-01
    XIAO DEMING
    Officer
    $31.20M
    @ $780.00 · 2025-08-01
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.50M
    @ $750.00 · 2025-07-01
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $36,900
    @ $738.00 · 2025-05-13
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $69,800
    @ $698.00 · 2025-05-12
    CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
    Director
    $65,000
    @ $650.00 · 2025-05-08
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.64M
    @ $700.00 · 2025-02-18
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.86M
    @ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $381,498
    @ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $474,721
    @ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
    XIAO DEMING
    Officer
    $474,721
    @ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $475,438
    @ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.37M
    @ $700.00 · 2025-02-07
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.55M
    @ $700.00 · 2025-01-24
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $600.00 · 2024-12-09
    HSING MICHAEL R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.15M
    @ $765.15 · 2024-11-08
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $561,620
    @ $765.15 · 2024-11-08
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $662,611
    @ $765.14 · 2024-11-08
    XIAO DEMING
    Officer
    $662,611
    @ $765.14 · 2024-11-08
    TSENG SARIA H
    General Counsel
    $662,611
    @ $765.14 · 2024-11-08
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $772.96 · 2024-11-01
    SCIAMMAS MAURICE
    Officer
    $10.23M
    @ $929.59 · 2024-10-07
    BLEGEN THEODORE BERNHARD
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.27M
    @ $908.36 · 2024-10-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MPWR
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    MPWR
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MPWR Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs MPWR

    Is Intel Corporation or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MPWR trades at a -57.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $727 vs. price $1148), compared to INTC's -1509.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $6 vs. $101).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?

    MPWR scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MPWR scores 42.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?

    Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) generates a 1.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?

    MPWR earns 20.5% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.