Compare StocksINTC vs MNST

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$73.74

Rewards

INTC
    MNST
    • Monster Beverage Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Monster Beverage Corporation scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 42.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    MNST
    • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MNST
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.94B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    2.69%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    38.01
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    28.86
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    23.25%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    23.09%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    55.85%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.57
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.01
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -1.03
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    INTC: 0Ties: 1MNST: 8
    INTCMNST

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    MNST

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MNST
    $4.35
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $5.05B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$21.96B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MNST
    25.1% Overvalued
    Price is 25.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $73.74
    Fair Value: $58.95
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MNST

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $74?

    +15.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.6%

    The market implies +15.9% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +15.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MNST
    96/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MNST
    -2.05
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MNST
    Insiders 28.5%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 2.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,738
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MNST
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MNST
    1
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.67M
    KELLY THOMAS J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $617,760
    @ $77.22 · 2026-03-13
    TIRRE EMELIE
    Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $73.31 · 2025-12-12
    CARLING GUY
    Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $71.33 · 2025-11-13
    VIDERGAUZ MARK S
    Director
    $637,300
    @ $63.73 · 2025-08-13
    KELLY THOMAS J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $63.40 · 2025-05-29
    TIRRE EMELIE
    Officer
    $549,398
    @ $62.46 · 2025-05-16
    VIDERGAUZ MARK S
    Director
    $212,170
    @ $60.62 · 2025-05-14
    KELLY THOMAS J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $552,700
    @ $55.27 · 2025-03-14
    CARLING GUY
    Officer
    $2.59M
    @ $55.02 · 2025-03-14
    TIRRE EMELIE
    Officer
    $5.06M
    @ $55.38 · 2025-03-04
    KELLY THOMAS J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $526,500
    @ $52.65 · 2024-12-13
    VIDERGAUZ MARK S
    Director
    $562,100
    @ $56.21 · 2024-11-12
    VIDERGAUZ MARK S
    Director
    $781,801
    @ $51.85 · 2024-06-11
    KELLY THOMAS J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $52.25 · 2024-06-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MNST
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    MNST
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MNST Full Analysis