Compare StocksINTC vs MMM

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs 3M Company (MMM)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
MMM
3M Company
$142.71

Rewards

INTC
    MMM
    • Altman Z-Score of 4.26 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    MMM
    • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 23.8x is 34% above the historical average of 17.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • High leverage (2.77x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MMM
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.26B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    1.68%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.82
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    15.18
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    13.68%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    68.46%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    39.91%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    2.77
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.19%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1MMM: 6
    INTCMMM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    MMM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MMM
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-6.43B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$29.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MMM
    10.7% Overvalued
    Price is 10.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $142.71
    Fair Value: $128.87
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MMM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $143?

    +10.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +23.6%

    The market implies +10.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +23.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MMM
    40/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MMM
    -2.28
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MMM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.3%Retail & Other 23.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,820
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MMM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MMM
    4
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $21.69M
    REINSETH THERESA E
    Officer
    $888,796
    @ $172.75 · 2026-02-11
    DICKSON ZOE L
    Officer
    $4.27M
    @ $170.34 · 2026-02-09
    DICKSON ZOE L
    Officer
    $3.49M
    @ $169.97 · 2026-02-09
    CHAVEZ RODRIGUEZ BEATRIZ KARINA
    Officer
    $203,645
    @ $171.13 · 2026-02-09
    DICKSON ZOE L
    Officer
    $2.35M
    @ $169.78 · 2025-11-13
    DICKSON ZOE L
    Officer
    $2.31M
    @ $169.82 · 2025-11-13
    MURPHY MARK W
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.17M
    @ $166.55 · 2025-10-29
    GORALSKI CHRISTIAN T JR
    President
    $925,860
    @ $150.18 · 2025-08-07
    REINSETH THERESA E
    Officer
    $523,741
    @ $150.63 · 2025-08-05
    BANOVETZ JOHN PATRICK
    Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $148.37 · 2025-05-23
    RHODES KEVIN H
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $154.02 · 2025-05-20
    DICKSON ZOE L
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $149.02 · 2025-05-15
    CLARKE VICTORIA
    Officer
    $269,878
    @ $154.22 · 2025-01-31
    ROMAN MICHAEL F
    Chairman of the Board
    $7.55M
    @ $152.30 · 2025-01-29
    BANOVETZ JOHN PATRICK
    Officer
    $726,249
    @ $151.36 · 2025-01-27
    DICKSON ZOE L
    Officer
    $542,957
    @ $149.41 · 2025-01-27
    CHAVEZ RODRIGUEZ BEATRIZ KARINA
    President
    $247,163
    @ $150.25 · 2025-01-27
    RHODES KEVIN H
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $149.85 · 2025-01-27
    REINSETH THERESA E
    Officer
    $346,241
    @ $149.95 · 2025-01-24
    GORALSKI CHRISTIAN T JR
    Officer
    $944,070
    @ $149.43 · 2025-01-24
    ROMAN MICHAEL F
    Chairman of the Board
    $6.79M
    @ $150.01 · 2025-01-24
    REINSETH THERESA E
    Officer
    $131,925
    @ $127.71 · 2024-11-20
    ROMAN MICHAEL F
    Chairman of the Board
    $700,608
    @ $123.46 · 2024-08-07
    REINSETH THERESA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $260,652
    @ $124.12 · 2024-08-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MMM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    MMM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MMM Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs 3M Company (MMM) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io