SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › INTC vs MDT

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Medtronic plc (MDT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. MDT is fairly valued at $79, with an intrinsic value of $79 and a margin of safety of 0%. Of the two, MDT has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
MDT
Medtronic plc
$79.34

Rewards

INTC
    MDT
    • ★Gross margin of 65.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

    Risks

    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    MDT

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTC
      MDT
      Valuation
      $-8.30B
      Free Cash Flow
      N/A
      -1.23%
      FCF Yield
      N/A
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      21.05
      86.70
      Forward P/E
      12.38
      Quality & Moat
      1.72%
      ROIC
      7.92%
      -2.91%
      ROE
      9.93%
      37.20%
      Gross Margin
      65.38%
      1.36
      PEG Ratio
      1.60
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.10
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.40
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.86
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      1.95
      0.00%
      Dividend Yield
      3.54%
      INTC: 3Ties: 1MDT: 5
      INTCMDT

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      MDT

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      MDT
      $16.10
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $1.23B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$19.72B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $133.99
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      MDT
      0.1% Margin of Safety
      Price is 0.1% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $79.34
      Fair Value: $79.42
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      MDT

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      MDT
      65/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTC
      -2.83
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      MDT
      -2.59
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,349
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      MDT
      Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.5%Retail & Other 10.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,027
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $249,985
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,946
      @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      MDT
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $462,750
      JELLISON WILLIAM R
      Director
      $462,750
      @ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      2
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $7.47M
      CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
      Chief Technology Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $4.01M
      @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      MDT
      1
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $9.32M
      KIIL HARRY SKIP
      Officer
      $336,965
      @ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
      KIIL HARRY SKIP
      Officer
      $5.13M
      @ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
      SMITH GREGORY L
      Officer
      $3.06M
      @ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
      KIIL HARRY SKIP
      Officer
      $788,048
      @ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
      WALL BRETT A
      Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
      WALL BRETT A
      Officer
      $792,038
      @ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(65/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      MDT
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTC
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
      MDT
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      View INTC Full AnalysisView MDT Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs MDT

      Is Intel Corporation or Medtronic plc more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, MDT trades at a 0.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $79 vs. price $79), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Medtronic plc?▼

      MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

      INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MDT scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Medtronic plc?▼

      MDT earns 7.9% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.