Compare StocksINTC vs MCK

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs McKesson Corporation (MCK)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
MCK
McKesson Corporation
$898.95

Rewards

INTC
    MCK
    • McKesson Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • McKesson Corporation scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 10.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    MCK
    • Gross margin of 3.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $4.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    MCK
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $9.16B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    8.25%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    25.97
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    20.32
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    55.61%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    N/A
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    3.45%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.68
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.97
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.36%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1MCK: 4
    INTCMCK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    MCK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MCK
    $5.41
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $8.91B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$48.14B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MCK
    19.8% Overvalued
    Price is 19.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $898.95
    Fair Value: $750.31
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MCK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $899?

    +15.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.5%

    The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MCK
    82/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MCK
    -2.43
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MCK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.5%Retail & Other 8.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,634
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MCK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MCK
    6
    Sells (3M)
    23
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $59.73M
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $990.00 · 2026-03-02
    MARTINEZ MARIA N.
    Director
    $328,013
    @ $939.87 · 2026-02-19
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $179,550
    @ $945.00 · 2026-02-17
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $282,817
    @ $933.39 · 2026-02-11
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $313,240
    @ $955.00 · 2026-02-06
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $225,266
    @ $816.18 · 2026-01-05
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $283,476
    @ $861.63 · 2025-11-07
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.42M
    @ $705.63 · 2025-08-22
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.09M
    @ $677.76 · 2025-08-15
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $218,347
    @ $663.67 · 2025-08-08
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.72M
    @ $708.09 · 2025-07-11
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.67M
    @ $705.93 · 2025-06-06
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $2.06M
    @ $712.18 · 2025-05-30
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $366,134
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $68,201
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $244,807
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $749,360
    @ $714.36 · 2025-05-27
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $115,154
    @ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $523,556
    @ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $895,190
    @ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.54M
    @ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $394,495
    @ $726.51 · 2025-05-19
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.68M
    @ $634.24 · 2025-03-06
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.59M
    @ $624.00 · 2025-02-28
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $188,760
    @ $605.00 · 2025-02-25
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.36M
    @ $597.99 · 2025-02-21
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.38M
    @ $600.66 · 2025-02-14
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $114,603
    @ $609.59 · 2025-02-12
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $331,645
    @ $572.79 · 2025-01-02
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $349,027
    @ $602.81 · 2024-12-09
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.11M
    @ $561.10 · 2024-09-05
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.35M
    @ $626.03 · 2024-08-05
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.18M
    @ $580.92 · 2024-07-03
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $351,318
    @ $585.53 · 2024-06-11
    MARTINEZ MARIA N.
    Director
    $282,979
    @ $585.88 · 2024-06-07
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.16M
    @ $574.41 · 2024-06-05
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $560.99 · 2024-05-31
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $225,924
    @ $553.74 · 2024-05-29
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $551.99 · 2024-05-29
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $512,939
    @ $556.33 · 2024-05-29
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $392,895
    @ $558.09 · 2024-05-23
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.12M
    @ $558.09 · 2024-05-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MCK
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    MCK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView MCK Full Analysis