Compare StocksINTC vs LYB

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs LyondellBasell Industries NV (LYB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, INTC is overvalued at $90, with a DCF intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. LYB is undervalued at $62, with an intrinsic value of $14933719042 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, LYB has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20
VS
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
$62.08

Risks

INTC
  • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
LYB
  • ROIC has declined by 13.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 12.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.42 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
LYB
Valuation
$4.87B
Free Cash Flow
$1.23B
1.07%
FCF Yield
N/A
N/A
Trailing P/E
N/A
44.27
Forward P/E
9.65
Quality & Moat
3.57%
ROIC
17.58%
-10.71%
ROE
-2.27%
38.87%
Gross Margin
12.89%
1.36
PEG Ratio
1.53
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
1.08
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.24
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.27
0.00%
Dividend Yield
6.64%
INTC: 5Ties: 1LYB: 4
INTCLYB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LYB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LYB
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.37B
Δ Market Cap
$-39.73
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $90.20
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LYB
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $62.08
Fair Value: $29584444697.22
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

+29.6%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

LYB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $62?

-2.6%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
LYB
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LYB
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,881
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LYB
Insiders 20.1%Institutions 78.0%Retail & Other 1.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,238
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LYB
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $246,621
FOLEY KIMBERLY A
Officer
$246,621
@ $43.56 · 2025-11-12
HANLEY MICHAEL SEAN
Director
$199,535
@ $57.01 · 2025-05-05
HANLEY MICHAEL SEAN
Director
$270,196
@ $72.05 · 2025-03-12
BUCHANAN ROBIN WILLIAM TURNBULL
Director
$380,300
@ $76.06 · 2024-12-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LYB
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.81M
KAPLAN JEFFREY A
Officer
$741,573
@ $74.16 · 2026-05-13
VANACKER PETER Z E
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $53.57 · 2025-08-15
FRIEDRICHS DALE D
Officer
$480,997
@ $96.78 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LYB
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
LYB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View INTC Full AnalysisView LYB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs LYB

Is Intel Corporation or LyondellBasell Industries NV more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, LYB trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $14933719042 vs. price $62), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or LyondellBasell Industries NV?

LYB scores 32/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is LyondellBasell Industries NV in financial distress?

LYB's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or LyondellBasell Industries NV?

LYB earns 17.6% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs LYB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io