Compare StocksINTC vs LW

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$43.86

Rewards

INTC
    LW
    • Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 21.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LW
    • Gross margin of 20.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • High leverage (2.20x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LW
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $596.99M
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    9.86%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    20.59
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    14.63
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    9.62%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    19.55%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    20.66%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.00
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    2.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.40
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    3.47%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1LW: 6
    INTCLW

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LW

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LW
    $-4.50
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.56B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-7.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LW
    90.7% Overvalued
    Price is 90.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $43.86
    Fair Value: $23.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LW

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $44?

    +12.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +5.3%

    The market implies +12.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LW
    61/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LW
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LW
    Insiders 3.1%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 3.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders819
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LW
    5
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $16.57M
    GRAY JAMES D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $199,781
    @ $43.85 · 2026-04-27
    JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
    Unknown
    $6.37M
    @ $42.48 · 2026-04-15
    JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
    Unknown
    $9.70M
    @ $41.11 · 2026-04-08
    PRESTAGE NORMAN
    Director
    $103,500
    @ $41.40 · 2026-04-07
    BENSEN PETER J
    Director
    $197,225
    @ $39.45 · 2026-04-06
    NIBLOCK ROBERT A
    Director
    $182,819
    @ $60.94 · 2025-01-13
    JURGENSEN WILLIAM GERALD
    Director
    $316,350
    @ $63.27 · 2024-12-23
    BLIXT CHARLES A
    Director
    $75,901
    @ $63.25 · 2024-12-23
    JURGENSEN WILLIAM GERALD
    Director
    $554,291
    @ $55.43 · 2024-07-26
    NIBLOCK ROBERT A
    Director
    $277,476
    @ $55.50 · 2024-07-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LW
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $99,973
    JONES GREGORY W
    Officer
    $99,973
    @ $62.48 · 2025-10-02
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LW
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    LW
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LW Full Analysis
    INTC vs LW: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io